PDA

View Full Version : Curiosity? Nasa?! MARTIANS!!


Bells
08-05-2012, 08:31 PM
Curiosity Closes in on its New 'Home'
Sat, 04 Aug 2012 08:20:24 PM GMT-0300

With Mars looming ever larger in front of it, NASA's Mars Science Laboratory spacecraft and its Curiosity rover are in the final stages of preparing for entry, descent and landing on the Red Planet at 10:31 p.m. PDT Aug. 5 (1:31 a.m. EDT Aug. 6). Curiosity remains in good health with all systems operating as expected. Today, the flight team uplinked and confirmed commands to make minor corrections to the spacecraft's navigation reference point parameters. This afternoon, as part of the onboard sequence of autonomous activities leading to the landing, catalyst bed heaters are being turned on to prepare the eight Mars Lander Engines that are part of MSL's descent propulsion system. As of 2:25 p.m. PDT (5:25 p.m. EDT), MSL was approximately 261,000 miles (420,039 kilometers) from Mars, closing in at a little more than 8,000 mph (about 3,600 meters per second).

I love how Nasa calls the final landing procedure the "7 Minutes of Terror" (http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/infographics/uploads/infographics/10776.jpg)


So yeah! pretty exciting stuff, the best we have right now is about to land on mars and on the upcoming months we could learn a lot about nothing or nothing about a lot!

As of this post we're 3 hours away from the landing and about a first a week away from the first results, this is somewhat akin of landing on the moon actually, which is pretty cool. Except is not (yet) putting people up there.

But hey, maybe in our lifetime?

phil_
08-05-2012, 08:49 PM
As of this post we're 3 hours away from the landingFour, sir.

I may or may not stay up and watch, depending on how the beer holds out. I'll be watching it here, on NASA's website. (http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/nasatv/) Pregame apparently begins at 11:30pm EDT, or 0330GMT, or an hour-and-a-half after this post righ'chere, whichever is easiest to understand.

Bells
08-05-2012, 09:00 PM
i don't know if people will be around, but that's totally something we could put a chat up for

Kyanbu The Legend
08-05-2012, 09:01 PM
Would be pretty cool to see Mars up close. X3

Aerozord
08-05-2012, 11:51 PM
I just want to know if these will be color images.


But hey, maybe in our lifetime?

I doubt we will ever go to mars. There is no profit in it (or atleast not enough to justify the risk) and those of us that feel "SCREW THAT ITS MARS" dont have that kind of money.

Flarecobra
08-06-2012, 12:02 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/abc-news-live-stream-coverage-20120309.html They're streaming the landing.

And I do beleve we will go to Mars. With it's smaller gravity, it can be a great place for manufacture.

Doc ock rokc
08-06-2012, 12:24 AM
Welp Lets just see where Curiosity will take us.

Flarecobra
08-06-2012, 12:28 AM
And a textbook landing.

Bells
08-06-2012, 12:31 AM
TOUCHDOWN!!!

We have landing, and a 50 billion RC card on Mars, Way to go NASA! This is awesome.

phil_
08-06-2012, 12:32 AM
Thirding that we've totally given the Martians a functioning nuclear reactor. Footage of the decent should be online tomorrow. Kinda annoyed that my link ended up being useless; luckily there are bloggers on the inside.

Bells
08-06-2012, 12:34 AM
Just go with the Nasa official Feed, is live and quite good

Whomper
08-06-2012, 01:22 AM
Curiosity sticks the landing to a wild ovation! NASA has won Gold in the 563 billion meters!

Aerozord
08-06-2012, 01:28 AM
And I do beleve we will go to Mars. With it's smaller gravity, it can be a great place for manufacture.

moon is closer with an even lower gravity.

Flarecobra
08-06-2012, 11:06 AM
Yep, but one has to keep in mind the floatiness factor. Plus with Mars having all that iron oxide... which can potentally be refined...

Ecks
08-06-2012, 12:44 PM
don't forget the polar ice caps, we wont have to ship water there

Flarecobra
08-06-2012, 12:47 PM
Not to mention people who just want to live there, so they can call themselves Martians.

Magus
08-06-2012, 12:49 PM
Not to mention the dystopian nightmare that is Total Recall.

Bells
08-06-2012, 01:21 PM
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/673770main_PIA15982-43_800-600.jpg

This is the first "Highish" quality picture of the landing site, using the Hazard Cams, so it's angled down and B/W. The High Def color pictures should come in the next days.... probably takes a long time to upload a high quality picture from Mars...

What i thought was funny was this tweet

MarsCuriosity @scarlet_leather I'll be able to take self portraits with MAHLI. It's out on the end of my arm and I can turn it to face me

...So many Facebook Photo jokes...

BTW, Twitter feed at @MarsCuriosity

Solid Snake
08-06-2012, 01:27 PM
Awesome Video.
The music really makes it.
So does the holy shit crazy magic science (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ki_Af_o9Q9s&)

Professor Smarmiarty
08-06-2012, 03:48 PM
Not to mention the dystopian nightmare that is Total Recall.

Wait what. Mars was full of hookers and robotcabs to take you to the hookers. How is that dystopian.

akaSM
08-06-2012, 04:12 PM
Yep, but one has to keep in mind the floatiness factor. Plus with Mars having all that iron oxide... which can potentally be refined...

OH MY GOD, you're right.

We'll have Mars hats soon!

Shyria Dracnoir
08-06-2012, 05:25 PM
http://theplastichippo.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/alien.jpg

I dunno, aka, while "exposed brain" does make a distinctive fashion statement, it looks itchy.

Shyria Dracnoir
08-06-2012, 09:11 PM
I'm hoping we'll be able to make first contact soon. Maybe once we pass the language barrier.

KTc3PsW5ghQ

Aerozord
08-09-2012, 02:41 PM
so we get any color images?

Bells
08-09-2012, 03:02 PM
First 360 panorama

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/675227main_pia16029-full_full.jpg

and a really nice one

http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/675358main_pia16032-full_full.jpg

Aerozord
08-09-2012, 03:14 PM
you know, it doesn't look all that alien even. Like if you showed me this out of context I'd probably just go "wow thats one heck of an overcast"

Aerozord
08-09-2012, 05:44 PM
oh and I mean that as a good thing not a dig at it. Not saying "oh, thats it" I'm saying "yea, I could totally see terraforming this place"

Flarecobra
08-09-2012, 05:59 PM
Looks a hell of a lot like some of the desert areas in Iraq.

Whomper
08-09-2012, 09:34 PM
Yeah, it definitely doesn't seem so red once you get up-close and personal. I'm lovin' this stuff.

Solid Snake
08-09-2012, 10:06 PM
Sign me up to terraform this hunk of rock. I've got little better to do.

Bells
08-09-2012, 10:23 PM
I'm not well versed into the Atmosphere of Mars... is that in the Horizon there a dust cloud or there is actually something that makes the sky look blue-ish?

Magus
08-09-2012, 10:52 PM
I'm not well versed into the Atmosphere of Mars... is that in the Horizon there a dust cloud or there is actually something that makes the sky look blue-ish?

Eh, isn't it's atmosphere pretty similar to ours, just without enough oxygen and thinner or whatever?

Looks a hell of a lot like some of the desert areas in Iraq.

Conspiracy theorists would probably have you believe that actually is Iraq.

The Artist Formerly Known as Hawk
08-10-2012, 01:18 AM
Yeah, it definitely doesn't seem so red once you get up-close and personal. I'm lovin' this stuff.

That's because a lot of photos of Mars are doctored to make it look redder, because people assume that the red planet should be, well, red. It really is just a dusky orange though.

Eh, isn't it's atmosphere pretty similar to ours, just without enough oxygen and thinner or whatever?


Eh, not really. Earths atmosphere is 78% nitrogen, 20% oxygen and the rest being a mix of all other gasses. Mars is like 90% carbon dioxide with small amounts (though much larger than earth) of argon, with nitrogen and oxygen being almost trace elements.

Then there's the fact it's thinner, has no magnetoshere and has about 1/3 the gravity.

Yeah, Mars ain't such a nice place to live.

Aerozord
08-10-2012, 02:02 AM
Eh, not really. Earths atmosphere is 78% nitrogen, 20% oxygen and the rest being a mix of all other gasses. Mars is like 90% carbon dioxide with small amounts (though much larger than earth) of argon, with nitrogen and oxygen being almost trace elements.

Then there's the fact it's thinner, has no magnetoshere and has about 1/3 the gravity.

Yeah, Mars ain't such a nice place to live.

theory is if we fill enough oxygen to equal pressure of the earth it would also make the ratio suitable for humans. Not actually earthlike though, they want tons of CO2 for a green-house effect just keeping it low enough it doesn't kill us.

I dont know if lack of magnetosphere is as much of an issue because its much further from the sun. I can see things like cronal mass ejections being a bigger deal. Aurora Borialus is the magnetospheres way of reminding you its the main reason your power grid doesn't explode.

Even a fully terraformed mars wouldn't be the best place to live but hey with nanotech, cybernetics and genetic engineering in 100 years you might not care.

Professor Smarmiarty
08-10-2012, 03:48 AM
It'll be alright once we find the ancient martian atmosphere making-machine.

Magus
08-10-2012, 11:06 AM
Yeah but the handprint will only have three fingers and we'll all sit around dumbfounded for a hundred years, our best scientific minds intellectually tortured day and night, haunted by their inability to figure out how to adapt our own hands to this sophisticated alien design.

It'll basically be like this: http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/154728/running-some-tests

Aerozord
08-10-2012, 04:26 PM
are we sure there is enough water there to be of much use to us though? Last time I checked (which was admittedly almost a decade ago) the "ice caps" were found to actually be frozen CO2 and they couldn't confirm another source of water.

Whomper
08-10-2012, 06:04 PM
Yeah, people seem to be conveniently forgetting the "oh crap, we need water to live?" part of this equation.

The Artist Formerly Known as Hawk
08-10-2012, 06:16 PM
I like to imagine it would be like Dune.

Flarecobra
08-10-2012, 06:21 PM
Hence my comparison to a desert. Though there are some theories that say that it can have water underground.

Aerozord
08-10-2012, 06:38 PM
know what I realized is the big issue with mars? Lack of hydrogen. If we had that we could just convert the CO2 into oxygen then just mix that with hydrogen to get water. Would also solve the lack of fuel on the planet

Bells
08-10-2012, 09:38 PM
That's why they want to verify if Mars ever had water or if it has/had any ice now or ever.

That would be the "long shot holy grail"

Mr.Bookworm
08-10-2012, 10:30 PM
are we sure there is enough water there to be of much use to us though? Last time I checked (which was admittedly almost a decade ago) the "ice caps" were found to actually be frozen CO2 and they couldn't confirm another source of water.

There's quite a bit of water on Mars, I don't know why people are acting like this isn't something we already know. Back in 2009, for instance, they estimated that the ice in the northern cap is equal to about 1/3 of the Greenland ice sheet. (http://onorbit.com/node/1524) So there's (very roughly) around 227,917 cubic miles of ice in the north ice cap alone.

know what I realized is the big issue with mars? Lack of hydrogen. If we had that we could just convert the CO2 into oxygen then just mix that with hydrogen to get water. Would also solve the lack of fuel on the planet

Ignoring the issue of how breaking apart C02 is actually fairly tricky, we can do this.

However, if your chemistry teacher back in high school ever performed this experiment, you might know what you need to combine the two (you can't stick atoms in a jar, shake it, and get a molecule).

Spoiler alert: It's fire.

http://www.otr.com/images/otrphotos/hindenburg1.jpg

Aerozord
08-10-2012, 11:35 PM
There's quite a bit of water on Mars, I don't know why people are acting like this isn't something we already know.

cause I said last time I checked was over a decade ago, which was before 2009

Ignoring the issue of how breaking apart C02 is actually fairly tricky, we can do this.yea but its possible, I'm thinking long term here, small amounts over centuries

However, if your chemistry teacher back in high school ever performed this experiment, you might know what you need to combine the two (you can't stick atoms in a jar, shake it, and get a molecule).

Spoiler alert: It's fire.so?

Really I mean yea you get heat and water vapor. Granted its more violent then burning fossil fuels but we can even take that energy and use it to help power splitting CO2 molecules since that is an endothermic reaction

stefan
08-10-2012, 11:47 PM
are we sure there is enough water there to be of much use to us though? Last time I checked (which was admittedly almost a decade ago) the "ice caps" were found to actually be frozen CO2 and they couldn't confirm another source of water.

This is incorrect. The last few probes and rovers directly sampled some of the ice and its confirmed to be water, and in fact the southern cap alone has enough ice that if you melted it down it would cover the entire surface with water with a depth of 30 feet.

What you're probably remembering is the discovery that the caps have a topcoating of frozen Co2, as during the martian winter it gets so cold that the atmospheric co2 literally freezes onto the surface.

The problem isn't getting water there, its getting it into a usable form; almost all of it is ice, and Mars' atmosphere is so thin that liquid water evaporates or freezes after a short time.

RobinStarwing
08-11-2012, 03:52 PM
Slightly related but (at least to me) funny pic.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8bkbjOYCX1qfs78no1_500.png

Second, I think it would actually be easier to live under the surface of Mars. But then we open up the whole line of finding out if Mars is a gateway to Hell and then one of us has to take on the Legion with a chainsaw.