View Full Version : deep thoughts for SERIOUS discussion
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbxae8NgTY1qil3kvo1_1280.png
Really makes you think...
pochercoaster
10-17-2012, 05:16 AM
http://imageshack.us/a/img267/4125/brainay.jpg
Professor Smarmiarty
10-17-2012, 05:52 AM
Words arose before forms of writing which suggests that they are merely symbolic representations belonging to the symoblic Real rather than the real Real. This fits with both post-structural interpretations of the change of language- in that it is an arbitrary octopus flailing wildly with its elusive tentacles but occasionally scoring a hit- and neuroscience which suggests that the signified and the signifier are processed in different parts of the brain (though with some overlap) and can be manipulated indepedently.
The brain did indeed name itself- calling back to the works of Descartes and Kant while ignored such other luminaries as Hegel and Heidegger who would minimise the influence on the brain in favour of a more procedural natural approach. We can't automatically discard their work, particularly as they are at the foundation of some many useful theories- in particular dialetical materialism which has proven tob e perhaps the most useful of tools in analysis of consciousness and culture- but if we reshape the brain as a unit into a unit which is procedural itself- and this fits with th eimmense plasticity that we know the brain possesses- then we can unite these disparate philosophical traditions.
Am I doing it right?
pochercoaster
10-17-2012, 06:16 AM
I refuse to believe that Kant contributed anything of value to humankind.
Professor Smarmiarty
10-17-2012, 06:20 AM
I kant believe you just said that.
E:Take it bakunin. My friend loves Kant and you have bentham out of shape.
I hope you found that humerous. I will locke it down now. I need to be stirner on myself in future.
Satan's Onion
10-17-2012, 09:49 PM
Hey! I don't know how it is for you guys, but around here we're a lot more careful with the word "Kant". It's degrading to philosophers.
RobinStarwing
10-17-2012, 10:07 PM
Hey! I don't know how it is for you guys, but around here we're a lot more careful with the word "Kant". It's degrading to philosophers.
It's just plane de-grating period.
Magus
10-17-2012, 10:20 PM
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable
PtgKkifJ0Pw
RickZarber
10-18-2012, 01:23 AM
http://imageshack.us/a/img141/7012/kantstop.png (http://www.topatoco.com/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=TO&Product_Code=DC-KANT&Category_Code=DC)
Amake
10-18-2012, 03:49 AM
I think I've missed something here, what's wrong with Kant? I find the categorical imperative one of the more excellent contributions to humankind.
But then, Smarty is speaking well of dead philosophers now so my hypothesis is this thread is the Twilight Zone.
Professor Smarmiarty
10-18-2012, 04:14 AM
People hate Kant because they are computer/math nerds whose mind would explode if they were to acknowledge something they can't express in a truth tree. It's pretty much one of my guidelines of when to bail on a conversation- works pretty well.
I hate Kant because he was a sexist ass who thought women weren't fit for "serious employment."
I hate Kant because he was a sexist ass who thought women weren't fit for "serious employment."
You hate the majority of men in history?
Amake
10-18-2012, 06:03 AM
With dead people, I find it's too late to teach them the error of their ways. What we can learn from them is what counts, and their faults work just as well as their virtues for that.
You hate the majority of men in history?
Don't you?
Like, I didn't think it needed saying, but the majority of men in history are awful fuckers who deserve to be hated.
Professor Smarmiarty
10-18-2012, 07:57 AM
That's a criticism of the time period though and not the individual thinkers themselves. And Kant was pretty central to the development of progressivism and moral progress which lead directly to the feminist/civil rights movements. Despite his individual views he was actual central to the movements of progress. Which actually happens a lot. NZ were the first country to give women the vote despite none of the cabinet actually wanting to do this and basically everyone just played chicken with each other and nobody blinked.
Like I hate all historical figures more than all of you put together but we can still examine them in the context of their time and in their contributions to development and anyone who removes Kant from the progress of civil rights is frankly deluded or simply trying to fluff up their own academic credentials by being all like "hey look I can discredit a thinker from 200 hundred years"- no shit, even the most enlightened thinker back then would be a huge bigot today. He was wildely read by progress campaigns and provided them language to talk about their movement.
I mean he was no Hegel or Marx who basically took his ideas and stripped out all the shit bits you are picking up on but that is about the progress of the time.
And also the "great thinker" idea of history is whig bullshit and completely nonsense, in that its societal progress, the great morass and not great thinkers that bring about major changes in thought/science/invention/war etc and thus Kant could be removed with out critically impairing the progress of enlightenment but the fact was he was there and he did contribute and people did take inspiration from him. While he is a fuck, in this DEEP THREAD FOR SERIOUS DISCUSSION, we should avoid the kneejerk reaction of the drinking hall and instead strive for the synthetic glory of the barricades.
Also he was a mean fullback.
That looks like a lotta bullshit that in no way invalidates hating Kant because he was a fuck.
Don't you?
Like, I didn't think it needed saying, but the majority of men in history are awful fuckers who deserve to be hated.
You're a pretty awful fucker who deserves to be hated by the standards of two hundred years from now too.
Professor Smarmiarty
10-18-2012, 08:57 AM
That looks like a lotta bullshit that in no way invalidates hating Kant because he was a fuck.
I'm glad to see you are living up to the title. And people always complain that I'm not serious enough.
I shall engage in a similar method of reasoning- Do you know who also hates Kants? Racists.
Therefore Kim=Racist.
QED.
A Zarkin' Frood
10-18-2012, 09:43 AM
Does that even make sense?
Also, stop pretending Kant is pronounced like can't. It makes the German in me cry. Instead say it like cunt.
Grimpond
10-18-2012, 09:46 AM
you'll need to take the "a" out. I kant bring myself to say it any other way until then
You're a pretty awful fucker who deserves to be hated by the standards of two hundred years from now too.
Fuck do I care? I'll be dead.
Karrrrrrrrrrrresche
10-18-2012, 10:06 AM
Fuck do I care? I'll be dead.
Or maybe you'll be the only one left alive!
Or a brain in a jar.
Or a g-g-g-ghoooooooooost wait if you were a ghost you'd still be dead
Or maybe you'll be the only one left alive!
In which case, Odjn's assumption will have proven false. :O
Karrrrrrrrrrrresche
10-18-2012, 10:14 AM
You'll be setting the standards, so maybe by then you'll begin to hate yourself?
I know when I get left alone with me for extended periods of time I start to hate myself.
A Zarkin' Frood
10-18-2012, 10:16 AM
That's only because you are terrible.
ba dum pish.
If I get too lonely I'll probably clone and fuck myself. Which will probably still result in me hating myself, but it'll be sexy.
RickZarber
10-18-2012, 11:02 AM
I find Kim's combination of righteous fury and general misanthropy to be slightly worrying. I mean, that's just one tragic accident away from becoming a supervillain!
CLEARLY YOU'VE NOT YET NOTICED MY AVATAR
Bells
10-18-2012, 12:15 PM
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_matd0xxo8J1rbmohwo1_400.jpg
amirite?
Kyanbu The Legend
10-18-2012, 12:25 PM
Yeah, you right.
pochercoaster
10-18-2012, 02:03 PM
Hating sexist white doods who have been dead for 200 years: the greatest crime of all!
There's something I find automatically repulsive about "time period" arguments. It feels like shirking responsibility.
Professor Smarmiarty
10-18-2012, 03:07 PM
I would have put it "seeking refuge in ignorance" but hey it works for the Rommel.
shiney
10-18-2012, 03:46 PM
Is this the obvious joke thread where it suddenly became actually serious? I disapprove, on grounds that there's already too much serious.
Someone post a pony gif or something.
Someone post a pony gif or something.
We're trying to make the thread better.
shiney
10-18-2012, 03:59 PM
Shut up, you.
Karrrrrrrrrrrresche
10-18-2012, 04:01 PM
Everytime I try to use an tag it turns it into an [i] tag.
I am gravely upset by this series of events.
[i]http://localhostr.com/file/930/EYzaIgOQRD9T/1334099891914.gif
I got this!
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lj52xxMjY51qzvqde.gif
RickZarber
10-18-2012, 04:07 PM
Also, where the crap you getting righteous fury. I ain't even bovvered. Oh, I just meant in general, not specifically this thread.
CLEARLY YOU'VE NOT YET NOTICED MY AVATAR I actually don't know what that is, but I guess I was correct in thinking you'd be partial to the idea? :P
Professor Smarmiarty
10-18-2012, 04:15 PM
I got confused by your internet sarcasm- Putting serious in the thread title activates SmartyRant mode- secret weakness.
I was totally trying to save it from being a terrible imagemacro thread where I succeeded.
Here's how to save the thread:
Althusser is the bossesst of boss- discuss.
Kyanbu The Legend
10-18-2012, 04:19 PM
Everytime I try to use an tag it turns it into an [i] tag.
I am gravely upset by this series of events.
[i]http://localhostr.com/file/930/EYzaIgOQRD9T/1334099891914.gif
There ya go.
EDIT: now it's happening to me.
It's because you aren't rehosting the images.
shiney
10-18-2012, 04:25 PM
Please view the forum-related stuff in re: image whitelist thread. We no longer accept images that haven't been rehosted.
rpgdemon
10-18-2012, 04:26 PM
It's because images not hosted through a list of approved hosts turn to italics. Does no one read the announcements forum anymore?
Krylo
10-18-2012, 04:26 PM
That's the best way to enforce that. And also hilarious.
I'm a quicker draw than both of you. I'm pretty sure this means I'm the new admin.
Krylo
10-18-2012, 04:26 PM
Does no one read the announcements forum anymore?
Implying anyone ever did.
stefan
10-18-2012, 04:27 PM
did someone say humorous .gif derail?
don't worry, I got this.
http://i.imgur.com/JbhsI.gif
http://i.imgur.com/3FM5l.gif
http://i.imgur.com/abkyl.gif
http://i.imgur.com/HM02c.gif
did someone say humorous .gif derail?
don't worry, I got this.
http://i.imgur.com/JbhsI.gif
http://i.imgur.com/3FM5l.gif
http://i.imgur.com/abkyl.gif
http://i.imgur.com/HM02c.gif
Don't make me ban you.
stefan
10-18-2012, 04:31 PM
Don't make me ban you.
Shiney would just undo it, I've got blackmail material on him from that one time he did belgian steak pornography for some quick cash back in '97.
Shiney would just undo it, I've got blackmail material on him from that one time he did belgian steak pornography for some quick cash back in '97.
Take a week off.
Professor Smarmiarty
10-18-2012, 04:35 PM
Man I'm sure glad you guys saved this thread! It's so much better now.
stefan
10-18-2012, 04:36 PM
Take a week off.
See? Untouchable.
rpgdemon
10-18-2012, 04:39 PM
Dude, I don't know that you want to be untouchable. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Untouchability)
Man I'm sure glad you guys saved this thread! It's so much better now.
Listen, I can't always bring my A-game. Other folks gotta pick up the slack.
Professor Smarmiarty
10-18-2012, 04:58 PM
Blame the league salary cap- we blew all our budget on you and me and everybody else we drafted from little leagues.
Bells
10-18-2012, 06:15 PM
http://i47.tinypic.com/fon0iv.jpg
cause, fuck context.
Also, you're all a bunch of tacos!
rpgdemon
10-18-2012, 06:34 PM
Um, I believe my user title proves otherwise.
Revising Ocelot
10-18-2012, 06:48 PM
You guys should flame me instead of each other, I'm like a sin eater for that kind of stuff.
Karrrrrrrrrrrresche
10-18-2012, 06:57 PM
Please view the forum-related stuff in re: image whitelist thread. We no longer accept images that haven't been rehosted.
But... I did rehost it! I rehosted it to localhostr.
RobinStarwing
10-18-2012, 07:04 PM
I would like to know what use using an alphabetic combination lock to link two carts together provides?
Shyria Dracnoir
10-18-2012, 08:18 PM
FUKKENSPIDERS
Shitty things made even shittier by being Australian #12: Public bathrooms
Krylo
10-18-2012, 09:03 PM
But... I did rehost it! I rehosted it to localhostr.
I suggest you ask meister to whitelist that then.
synkr0nized
10-18-2012, 09:19 PM
Already done, folks, move along.
Karrrrrrrrrrrresche
10-18-2012, 09:49 PM
I suggest you ask meister to whitelist that then.
http://localhostr.com/file/1foMpWOIxVLK/0q1E0.gif
Also idle thought maybe while the mods are already bending over backwards to do things that will only ever be useful for me you could also make my avatar this
http://localhostr.com/file/niDnSZKpoWwY/1349298032464.gif
synkr0nized
10-18-2012, 10:16 PM
word
That's not too far over the avatar limit, so consider this an easy gift.
Karrrrrrrrrrrresche
10-18-2012, 10:20 PM
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay
Meister
10-19-2012, 01:18 AM
With that out of the way, closing this one, cause it's getting incoherent. Picture dump is this way (http://nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=38238), chatroom is that way (http://nuklearforums.com/chat).
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.