The Warring States of NPF

The Warring States of NPF (http://www.nuklearforums.com/index.php)
-   Bullshit Mountain (http://www.nuklearforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   "Global Warming" or "Interesting Debate On Munk" (http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=37411)

Azisien 03-10-2010 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smarty McBarrelpants (Post 1023705)
But then we have people arguing "Oh noes, we can't lower CO2. Who knows what it'll do- I'm so wacky!"

Haha, those wacky people will do that.

Here's the thing, the public probably won't get their governments to do it in short order, particularly in many countries.

So the only other option is politicians looking beyond the next election results and going "Fuck it" which also probably won't happen on a mass scale. And even if multiple governments did do this, everybody'd just scream dictator/fascism/whatever.

I don't know the approach required but I imagine a rigourous education campaign is required. Sadly, the conspiracy stuff has muddled the waters.

Osterbaum 03-10-2010 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mondt
So much aggression is going on here.

Well it is a heated issue.

Professor Smarmiarty 03-10-2010 10:33 AM

This is why we need to stop treating the objections as valid. They are not and treating them as such just prevents progress.

Bob The Mercenary 03-10-2010 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smarty McBarrelpants (Post 1023732)
This is why we need to stop treating the objections as valid. They are not and treating them as such just prevents progress.

I don't know if you meant it or not, but that is the most totalitarian thing I've ever read. xD

Professor Smarmiarty 03-10-2010 11:21 AM

OK but I'm going to expect you next time you are ill, for éxample, to not go to a doctor but instead take an opinion poll on your treatment. Or maybe ring up some rich people and ask what will cause the least problems for them in your treatment.
It's one of the great tragedies of free speech that it is interpreted through the modern media as giving equal time to conflicting opinion - ie people who are legitimate experts on one hand and random fuckers off the street on the other

Mondt 03-10-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osterbaum (Post 1023731)
Well it is a heated issue.

I just wanna see some people be cool about it though. =/

Green Spanner 03-10-2010 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mondt (Post 1023850)
I just wanna see some people be cool about it though. =/

The problem with topics like this, though, is that people will rarely warm to the opposition.

Osterbaum 03-10-2010 07:27 PM

Not to mention that a heated issue will cause extremities on both sides of the argument.

Geminex 03-10-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Green Spanner (Post 1023853)
The problem with topics like this, though, is that people will rarely warm to the opposition.

That's because it creates an atmosphere of uncertainty.

CABAL49 03-10-2010 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geminex (Post 1023859)
That's because it creates an atmosphere of uncertainty.

I got it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.