Papal infallability only applies in rare situations when a lot of conditions are met and the pope explicity calls it. As far as I know- this has only ever happened once.
I'm pretty sure when he was letting off pedos he wasn't up in his papal chair issuing the proper decrees and so forth.

Retweet @Fifthfiend:

"Apparently accusing the pope of child molestation makes the baby Jesus cry. Things that do not make the baby Jesus cry; being molested, apparently!"

I'd say more but really there's not much other than "hoshits fire this asshole."

Once might be understating it.

Edit: Not that the essential point doesn't stand.

Only one of those came after papal infallability was actually defined and the rules of it laid out- the rest are retroactive and are debatable/not clearly set out to follow a set of rules like the assumption of Mary.
And it usually best to ignore the earlier popes cause all kinds of shit will come up.

If I remember correctly back then during those wacky middle ages or renaissance one pope was really a woman and she was pregnant. And we all know that women shouldn't be given any power. You gotta keep them in the kitchen.

But like I don't even remember where I heard about that or what the pope's name was and this may be false information but I'm sure that I heard it from somewhere which wasn't internet.

One pope turned the vatican into essentialy a brothel. People are saying Benedict is "Worst pope ever" but he's got a way to go yet.

I hate my religion. Incidentally, if you can understand spanish this song is pretty great concerning the current subject.

Pretty sure BrothelPope was the best pope, Smarty.

http://www.harkavagrant.com/history/popeactionsm.png

JPII for life, suckas!

I fail to see the problem with this? clearly a brothel is a better thing to spend time on the molesting children. I for one would vote for a brothel vatican!