![]() |
for the lulz
@Mirai -- hence the quotes. They have blogs/articles and reviews and things like that, so it kind of works. I mean clearly their focus is on entertainment and not just straight news and commentary, so it's not like sitting around reading Kotaku or IGN all day.
@NonCon -- My intent is not to sound like I am defending Yahtzee from your opinion, but I am amused at your complaint of him "bitching" when you run a game review site with the tagline "We hate the games you like. That's how we know we're right." |
Quote:
|
Yeah I know about their articles - I even said they have them. They're just of a completely different cut from most mainstream 'news' sites since their manner is pretty laid-back.
Quote:
Quote:
|
I admit I don't follow Yahtzee much anymore. It might be because I'm having a harder time following what the man is saying (either he's faster, or its because I've lost interest in hearing everything he says). Or its because he's become a prick who just can't be bothered to say anything good about a game.
The reviews don't seem to be about what games are really good & which ones are awful, its just about him pointing out every little nitpick. And maybe its just because I've tired of his style, but his comments don't even seem all that clever anymore (of course, not being able to follow his quick speech doesn't help). Maybe its just me, but his reviews are too much shtick, and not enough review. SWB |
I'm actually fairly nice to games, in my opinion. Just thought the tagline was funny.
Quote:
|
You guys are all way overthinking this. Yahtzee complains about games. Doesn't matter if it's a steaming pile of a game or the most fantastic thing ever to grace the earth, he's going to complain about it. Even if he likes it he'll find faults, unless it's Pyschonauts or Portal. Whether it's hard, easy, a joy to play or a hellish descent into frustration, whether it has the tiniest of real faults to split hairs over, or gaping holes in plot, gameplay mechanics or graphical quality, he will complain about it.
It's called taking the piss, whether he has to be a hypocrit or not the only reason he's doing the reviews is to take the piss and complain, whether his complaints are justified or not. It's harmless, biased, hypocritical, fun that has no real meaning at the end of the day. So just lighten up, don't take anything he says seriously. He's ragged on enough of my own favourite games before now and while I don't agree with the things he says it doesn't mean I still can't laugh along with it. And if you don't find it funny and his complaints do get on your nerves, then don't watch his videos. Simple as that. |
Quote:
|
You know, I think Yahtzee himself said that he's a critic on several occasions. That's what he does is criticize, and he does it in a humorous way. He also tosses in the merits of a game amongst the bile and frankly, I consider him much more reliable than any of the other reviewers on the site, who all seem too keen on polishing the apple unless there's no possible way they can justify it. Or at least that's how it is in their video "supplements." I've been going through them out of sheer boredom today, and it's really starting to irk me with all the "this game adds nothing to gaming or its own series, but that's vaguely okay somehow" or "well, the game sucks, but listen to that soundtrack. Mmmmmm, soundtrack..." bull that really makes it all sound very castrated and wimpy, like they're afraid of getting their houses burned down. Yahtzee doesn't pussyfoot around like that.
Edit: Jordan Deam is probably the best non-Yahtzee reviewer in terms of honesty. The editor seems way too keen on spinning games to make even the flaws sound good, while the only female of the bunch seems to like everything unless it's outright sexist, and while she's not terrible, I feel like I have to take what she says with a grain of salt. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.