There is a great difference between explaining the limitations of logic and using incredibly faulty logic to come to incorrect conclusions as "proof" that logic is flawed.

But can you see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

I know this because you be tellin' LIES alla time, like a liar would.
 

Man you lyin'. You a lyin' commie.

It's written not spoken therefore it's libel, not slander, no?

http://i606.photobucket.com/albums/t...ticons/v-1.gif Complete thread collapse in three sentences, impressively executed.

Still talking about the bridges between the mind and other realms, not the mind itself.

Although I will give The Origin of Consciousness another try. I've been looking for an excuse to read it.

The mind itself still isn't disprovable, re: Descartes via Nietzsche (something thinks, therefore something is.) Of course, that's not science, but so isn't this thread!

Godel disagrees with pages and pages of maths.


I'm not sure what the question is here. Do I need to disprove that kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch? Because this thread is about destroying science not proving it.

9) See 7 where I dismiss Marx as a hack

10) I spoke it aloud as I read it.
11) Thread still going, postulate disproven.
Bridges that have been shown to rely heavily on physical world. No matter how you spin it, your imaginary functions relies upon physical processes.

12) Human intelligence lead to tool making, dominance over other animals
Latest poll result shows Tories leading by wide margin. Thus humans are stupid, thus this is fault.

13) Neurotransmitters only work in certain kinds of neuroreceptors based on lock and key type mechanisms- Patentely false, molecular mechanic hard sphere type models consistently fail in modelling organic processes due to theri soft electron systems which are easily perturbed, particularly the pi bonding networks of neurotransmitter type molecules.

14) Origin of life started in water- Water promotes hydrolysis of early peptide bonds rather than their formation, solutions would be too diluted to feasibly react, common energy sources for the reactions are hindered by the presence of water.

Hegel, Marx, Heidegger, Lacan- all would take you up on that.
Also of course this thread isn't Science- it's showing Science is wrong!

It's only physical tools that have shown the physical world to be the origin of all existence. I think it was Buddha who said, "We are spiritual beings having a human experience".

But anyway, like I said, even if imagination is a product of a physical world which is a figment of imagination, that's no reason to assume imagination also is a figment of imagination.

Ok SMB, what about the theory of the average IQ in the world dropping due to the accelerated breeding of humans with inferior minds, our heightened medicines, and no natural predators, combined with the fact that lower IQ families have, on average, twice as many children as higher intelligence families do. Can you disprove that, while the human race is growing, we are getting less intelligent as a whole?