Well considering I'm working against scum interests does that make you scum?

So confusing! I'm choosing at Random.

##Vote: Ryanderman

(You brought this on yourselves. Especially Smarty.)

D --> I take e%ception to you all thinking I am scum. Honestly. What have I done? Nothing. What have others done? Nothing.

D --> Granted when something happens I will be all for a good old-fashioned lynch mob, especially if a victim is of b100 b100d. But until then I urge you all to sit down and be quiet.

The "nothing" that you have done is start to initiate a no lynch which is not infact nothing but it is something and a very bad something at that.

It is only the wisest course of action if you are indeed scum. Which is my entire point.

Even though Smarty is playing the "I'm so obviously pro-town anyone who disagrees with me is obviously anti-town" gambit to the tee, I'm going to ##Vote: Thadius because he is insisting on posting in character. I'll remove it once he stops, or we'll end up lynching someone who posts in [color=eyeblight], but either way win win.

best course of action, as proven time and time again, is to kill someone on day one. Going with a no lynch on day one gives us no hints whatsoever on day 2 as to who to go after. The mafia will just kill someone at night, the flavor text will not hint at anything, then we'll be like "well...we have no clues again, back to square one, but less people".

Admittedly, we'll have one less person on day 2 if we do lynch someone, we will atleast have a starting point if we lynch a scum on day 1, or if townie, see who was most gung-ho about killing or most complacent with just killing someone who wasn't mafia.

It's not the gambit I'm playing. I'm playing the "These guys are advocating ridiculous scummy strategies" gambit. It got nothing to do with me, it got everythingg to do with going for no lynch on day one is stupid as fuck if you are town.

Also lynching Thad has secondary advantage of getting rid of annoying in character speaking.