|
Ok so who is inactive so far? IF you guys are saying killing an inactive is better as they aren't contributing?
|
ITT: Everyone has their own ideas of what is a good opening gambit all around, and Smarty is probably the cult leader.
Edit: Inactives need to be proven inactive, and not just lurking for the sake of screwin' with people. Power roles tend to be lurkers or heavy posters as opposed to absentees. "Vanilla Town" isn't a label that people care too much about. |
I don't see why we should differentiate between inactives and lurkers. If you are lurking that doesn't help town much, town needs people to talk and vote duringthe day because that is the major problem. I have no problem voting lurkers at all.
Also if we start voting lurkers, the other lurkers wills tart talking, that is pretty much the end goal here. If we're voting inactives and you want a definite inactive (if you have problems voting lurkers) I would stick by Fawfulcopter- never made a post, hasn't played past games so we can't judge his inactive behaviour against that and doesn't post anywhere else in the forums so we can't say whats up. That'spretty inactive to me. |
Smarty: The second time I quoted you I was reinforcing your point, not detracting from it.
You said: "The scum know who each other are, they don't want information to be spread around the town." Then I responded with, "The logic you just articulated is exactly why I'm skeptical of people who want to vote you or I off right now with the underlying logic that we're being too active / weird / 'productive' / gambit-ing D1." (To clarify, the exact nature of my argument is: Scum only benefits from discouraging activity, therefore if someone on the Scumteam pressures anyone who dares try to make things 'serious' and insinuates all such activity is scummy, activity will be discouraged as Town roles, particularly Town power, avoid articulating their suspicions or plotting pro-town strategies for fear that their efforts will be 'rewarded' with votes and that they'd have a better chance of surviving personally through inactivity. Scum benefits most if they can get individual Townies to adopt personal survival strategies -- if Townies are goaded into valuing their own survival over the success of the Town as a whole, Town might as well just hand the keys over.) (...Coincidentally, not long after I advanced that argument, a very similar stylistic argument was turned against me under the pretense of "By discouraging random voting, Snake is discouraging activity," which I completely disagree with because asking people to merely approach the game intelligently only discourages activity if people refuse to play the game smart and just want to goof off.) And then I explained my criticism of the argument made by those individuals who tried to advance the argument that I was actively and seriously participating D1, therefore I was scummy. I do not believe interpreting my posts accurately is hard, it just requires actually reading them instead of saying "Pink wall of text, I'd like to avoid that." Anyway I really want to hear from Bob the Merc. Where are you, Bob the Merc? |
Quote:
|
Sure, call him the cult leader because he's a communist.
Way to be a nice person, Nikose. |
Oh ok, I misunderstand your poit Snake. I think you are massively underestimating the rationale of the random vote (or I'm massively overestimating it- but it's hitscum in about half the games I've played).
|
Also communists hate cults! They all about scientific enlightenment.
|
Alduin was culted night 0.
RPG is serial Killer. Snake is probably going to die by mafia kill night one. Bob the merc is Cult leader. |
It was Nikose in the billiards room with the revolver.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.