![]() |
Final Fantasy - The Time Loop
Quote:
EDIT: And yeah, I wrote it. I just put it in a quote box for aesthetics. ^^ |
I'd say that's one of the most reasonable and understandable presentations of the time loop I've read yet.
|
Hmmm...I sort of half get it. You lost me at the whole "tangent universe" thing. But it does explain it a lot better than the game does, which was just pretty much "I am Garland, the worst knight ever! But now you have found me in the past, and now I am Chaos, bwhahahaha! Die!" Where did you find this anyway?
EDIT: I read it again, and I now get the "tangent universe" idea. That's a pretty profound explanation. |
That makes even more sense to me, seeing how I just beat Final Fantasy in Dawn of Souls.
Meister, you rock. That is probably the most accurate and precise explanation to date. I am no longer confused. That is a very well done explanation. :) |
I wrote it myself after playing through the Dawn of Souls version, which for all its shortcomings has the advantage of better in-game text that goes a long way in explaining things. Yay me. ^^
The tangent universe (or, as you could say, parallel universe) is probably the only way to deal with the paradoxons inherent in most time travel stories. Think of it this way: in one universe the Light Warriors defeated Chaos, in another they didn't. In the game you see them travel from the reality where they didn't back in time to the splitting point, from where they likely ended up in the other one. That or they, too, ended up never existing except in people's collective subconscious. |
Well, to be very technical, the terms "parallel" and "tangent" are both incorrect. Parallel implies that they never meet. This is not so, because up until Chaos' death/triumph, they are one and the same. Tangent implies that they only touch in one point. The timelines intersect at one point, but only there. Again, that is not true. The timeline merely splits in two at that moment. Therefore, the most correct term to use there would be "alternate."
That's just my two cents. And I loved your explanation...Dawn of Souls does indeed help the explanations a bit. -A |
This does actually explain a lot, but there's one thing that sometimes comes to my mind that no one seems to dwell on: What happens to everything after the 2000 year period? The game implies that time comes to a screeching halt and goes back 2000 years. But does it really? Doesn't it just continue without any reprecussions? Because if it didn't, then you would have no chance to relight the crystals because Garland has already gone to the past, become Chaos and has sent the Fiends into the future. Yet you have all the time in the world to go through the time gate.
But perhaps a wizard did it. ;) |
If you recall, after each fiend was defeated, they were yanked out of the future and back to Chaos's time when he first created them so when Garland was defeated 1600 years later, they pulled him back 1600 years so he would become Chaos to send them forward so they would ensure everything went according to plan...
I think... I hate time travel. |
I have always preferred the theory of 'alternate' timelines, each born of a branch from the original timeline, i.e. the big bang. Though even parallell time lines, which do not touch one another, can have weak points in which something from one may escape into the other. This helps to avoid the whole time paradox notion which could really only take place in a universe with a solitary timeline. Or, at least, that's what I've gleaned from Doctor Who.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.