Ah, Roy, when you said she made a convincing argument I assumed that meant you agreed with her.

I'm still keeping an eye on you, but I am keeping an eye on everyone.

This is a logical dead end. Its a damned if you do damned if you don't situation. If you talk to little you are trying to hide and if you talk to much you are trying to divert attention away from yourself. So the best course of action is just to talk as much as you feel is needed. It can be suggestive but on its own its very weak.

No, I was just presenting the possible sides.

Sorta like "Silly Kitty is watching YOU" ?

Hmm... Roy you are acting slightly suspicious. You've mainly been just commenting on other people's opinions not adding too much yourself. that would be a nice medium too what Sithdarth was saying earlier (your damned if you post too much and your damned if you post too little.)

Well as of yet not alot of evidence exists to form an opinion.
So any suspicions are already stated. or are just random.

Yes but that doesn't mean you have to restate the evidence that just makes it even more confusing than it already is thus making it easier for potentially harmful people to get away with multiple slip-ups

Vote Update:

Sithdarth (1):
-Mesden

The Space Pope (1):
-Inbred Chocobo


No deadline yet.

Okay, wanna know what I think? That Mesden and/or Sith are mafia. I am also supsicious of Ogianres, because he was complaining about someone being "too helpful". And wouldn't it be just great, for the Mafia to get the town to kill a real helpful guy, and then the Mafia gets to kill someone else? I realize that this makes me look like I think a Mafia member could be trying to off a Mafia member, but that could be part of the plan!

This is what I get for playing a game like Mafia while being a conspiracy theorist.

Hm, when you say that someone has a convincing argument that must mean it is convincing someone. When you are the person saying it is a convincing argument that most likely means you are the one convinced. If the argument doesn't convince you does that make it convincing? So must agree with Mes or you wouldn't have called her argument convincing. Saying that her argument is convincing is not presenting possible sides. In your next sentence you did present possible sides but in your first statement you did not.

Okay, my apologies, I misused the words. How 'bout if I say "Mes makes a good argument"? Because you don't have to agree with someone to realize that they've made a good argument.