The Warring States of NPF

The Warring States of NPF (http://www.nuklearforums.com/index.php)
-   Dead threads (http://www.nuklearforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=91)
-   -   Plan B, approved! (http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=15037)

dposse 08-24-2006 04:23 PM

Plan B, approved!
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14497678/

Quote:

WASHINGTON - Women may buy the morning-after pill without a prescription — but only with proof they’re 18 or older, federal health officials decided Thursday. The Food and Drug Administration ruling culminated a contentious three-year effort to ease access to the emergency contraceptive.

Girls 17 and younger still will need a doctor’s note to buy the pills, called Plan B, the FDA told manufacturer Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc.

The compromise decision is a partial victory for women’s advocacy and medical groups which say eliminating sales restrictions could cut in half the nation’s 3 million annual unplanned pregnancies. Opponents have argued that wider access could increase promiscuity.

The long delay had ensnared President Bush’s nominee to head the FDA. On Thursday, two senators said they would lift their blockade, making confirmation of Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach as FDA’s commissioner likely next month.

The pills are a concentrated dose of the same drug found in many regular birth-control pills. Taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, a woman can lower the risk of pregnancy by up to 89 percent. If she already is pregnant, the pills have no effect.

The earlier it’s taken, the more effective Plan B is. But it can be hard to find a doctor to write a prescription in time, especially on weekends and holidays. Hence the push to allow nonprescription sales.

Barr has said it hopes to begin nonprescription sales of Plan B by the end of the year. The pills will be sold only from behind the counter at pharmacies — so the pharmacist can check photo identification — but not at convenience stores or gas stations.

There isn’t enough scientific evidence that young teens can safely use Plan B without a doctor’s supervision, von Eschenbach said in a memo.

But Barr did prove that over-the-counter use is safe for older teens and adults — and licensed pharmacies are used to checking for proof of age 18 before selling tobacco and certain other products, von Eschenbach wrote in explaining the agency’s age cutoff.

“This approach should help ensure safe and effective use of the product,” he concluded.

Plan B’s maker was disappointed that FDA imposed the age restriction and pledged to continue working the agency to try to eliminate it.

“While we still feel that Plan B should be available to a broader age group without a prescription, we are pleased that the Agency has determined that Plan B is safe and effective for use by those 18 years of age and older as an over-the-counter product,” said Bruce L. Downey, Barr’s chairman.

The age restriction remains controversial even inside FDA, agency drugs chief Dr. Steven Galson told The Associated Press Thursday. Galson has acknowledged overruling his staff scientists’ opinion in 2004 that nonprescription sales would be safe for all ages.

“Let me be frank, there still are disagreements,” Galson said in an interview. “There were disagreements from the first second this application came in the house.”

But, “I’m convinced adolescents are a different group, they require special analyses, sometimes special data,” he added.

As a condition of approval, Barr agreed to track whether pharmacists are enforcing the age restriction, by, among other things, sending anonymous shoppers to buy Plan B. FDA said Barr is to conduct that formal tracking at least twice in the first year of sales and annually thereafter, and report stores that break the rules to their state pharmacy licensing boards.

But Barr also will conduct a national education campaign to raise awareness of emergency contraception, among both women and health providers.

The two-pill pack of Plan B today costs from $25 to $40; Barr hasn’t said if it will raise the price. Planned Parenthood, already a main dispenser of the pills, expects some insurers to continue covering prescription sales for those who seek the drug that way. But which way is cheaper depends on a woman’s insurance.

A Barr spokeswoman estimated that pharmacists dispense about 1.5 million packs a year.

Nine states — Washington, California, New Mexico, Alaska, Hawaii, Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Vermont — already allow women of any age to buy Plan B without a doctor’s prescription from certain pharmacies. Proponents of those pharmacy access programs believe that minors won’t see any change in those states, because the pharmacist already technically writes a prescription.

The FDA approved prescription-only sales of Plan B in 1999, and the quest to sell nationwide without a doctor’s note began in 2003. That year, the agency’s independent scientific advisers overwhelmingly backed nonprescription sales for all ages, and FDA’s staff scientists agreed.

But higher-ranking officials rejected that decision, citing concern about young teens’ use of the pills without a doctor’s oversight. Barr reapplied, asking that women 16 and older be allowed to buy Plan B without a prescription. Then, last August, the FDA postponed a final decision indefinitely, saying the agency needed to determine how to enforce those age restrictions.

FDA’s handling of Plan B sparked a firestorm: Critics charged that political ideology had trumped science; a reproductive-rights group sued to force FDA to settle the issue; and congressional auditors concluded the agency may have made decisions without reviewing all the evidence.

Still, nationwide nonprescription sales were widely consider a doomed issue until last month, when the FDA reversed itself and said it would reconsider if Barr agreed to an age 18 restriction. That surprise announcement came on the eve of a Senate committee hearing on whether to confirm von Eschenbach as FDA’s new head.

On Thursday, Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., and Patty Murray, D-Wash., said they would lift their roadblock to his full Senate confirmation.

“While we urge the FDA to revisit placing age restrictions on the sale of Plan B, it is real progress that millions of American women will now have increased access to emergency contraception,” they said in a joint statement.

Proponents hailed the victory but had hoped for more.

“While I am glad that the drumbeat for a return to a science-based FDA has had some positive impact, this decision still represents a compromise, one that could have the unintended consequence of hurting young women’s health,” said Dr. Susan Wood, who resigned as FDA’s women’s health chief to protest the agency’s 2005 delay.

But opponent Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, said Plan B’s wider availability could give women a false sense of security, since it isn’t as effective as regular birth control. Wright also worries that adult men who have sex with minor girls could force the pills upon them.

The FDA said men 18 and older will be able to buy the pills without a prescription.
From April: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...040100005.html
Quote:

There's the rub. If you think a fertilized egg is a human being, as most anti-abortion activists do, then preventing it from attaching to the uterus is abortion. Some anti-abortion groups--Americans United for Life, the American Life League and Concerned Women for America--assert flatly that Plan B does this. The National Right to Life Committee, however, isn't sure. It's taking no position until Plan B's effects are clarified. The South Dakota legislature, which banned abortions a month ago, exempted any "contraceptive measure, drug or chemical, if it is administered prior to the time when a pregnancy could be determined through conventional medical testing"--i.e., Plan B.
WOOHOO! Finally, the womens right to choose what the hell they do with their own body is protected by the Federal government. Take that, pro-life people!! The age restriction might actually be a good idea.

Anyway, what do you think? Is the age restriction a good idea? Is 18 the right age, or should it be set higher? Should Plan B be over the counter? Should Plan B even be a option for women? Should things like what has been happening in South Dakota be allowed? I've already stated my opinion, it's time for you to share yours! :)

Whale Biologist 08-24-2006 04:25 PM

I suppose taking a massive dose of hormones IS easier than using condoms...

Nikose Tyris 08-24-2006 04:33 PM

Um. Pro life loser that I am, I don't find that disagreeable at all. it's a child after it attaches and begins to grow. The 72 hour pill is like a dangerous condom more than anything, in my eyes.

But I heard the 72 hour pill had massive repercussions; puking, diarhea, etc.

Was this all untrue?

Funka Genocide 08-24-2006 05:29 PM

I must say that your usage of the term "pro life loser" seems insulting and unneccessary. Perhaps you could restate it?

That being said, it's a woman's right to decide what she does with her body, I am for abortions and all that jazz. I guess you'd call me "pro-choice" but I don't care for those labels myself.

I don't understand the age limit for this medication. If anything this pill should be made available to anonymous young mothers, they are the most likely to benefit from it in my oppinion. One of the major concerns I have is of course teen pregnancy, and as much as I'd like to believe that young men and women will miraculously become responsible, I hold no notions that accidents will occur. Younger couples are less likely to use condoms due to an inability or trepidation in purchasing them, are less likely to have access to birth control, and are less likely to inform a doctor (which really means informing the parents) when thye might need these pills. This pill could be some little girls last chance at a normal life, and it seems shame to deny it to her.

Sky Warrior Bob 08-24-2006 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nikose
Um. Pro life loser that I am, I don't find that disagreeable at all. it's a child after it attaches and begins to grow. The 72 hour pill is like a dangerous condom more than anything, in my eyes.

But I heard the 72 hour pill had massive repercussions; puking, diarhea, etc.

Was this all untrue?

I've heard none of that, and it wouldn't suprise me if some disinformation about Plan B would be out there. I wouldn't think it'd have any more side effects than what the current pill does (Ortho-TriCyclin-Lo?), since Plan B shares many of the same chemical properties.

And on topic, Planned Parenthood's reaction, as well as a description of the Plan B medication:
http://ppfa.org/pp2/portal/files/por...4-ecatlast.xml

SWB

Roy_D_Mylote 08-24-2006 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Funka Genocide
This pill could be some little girls last chance at a normal life, and it seems shame to deny it to her.

Something else that'd ensure a girl's last chance at a normal life?

Keep. Legs. Closed. Keep. Fuckstick. In. Pants.

Mesden 08-24-2006 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roy_D_Mylote
Something else that'd ensure a girl's last chance at a normal life?

Keep. Legs. Closed. Keep. Fuckstick. In. Pants.

Healthy sex life is normal. So, no, I mean, that'd be taking away something. The pill let's her keep her currently normal life without the, well, Funka already said it.

Azisien 08-24-2006 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mesden
Healthy sex life is normal. So, no, I mean, that'd be taking away something. The pill let's her keep her currently normal life without the, well, Funka already said it.

I'd say that's argueable. There are so many ways to have fun, or have a healthy sex life, without having an orgasm in a vagina, or vice versa. That might sound kind of contradictory in a way, if you consider a sex life to be ONLY intercourse, but in my experience the massive hormoral drives to mate can be satisfied without intercourse, and definitely go beyond simple masturbation.

dposse 08-24-2006 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Funka Genocide
I must say that your usage of the term "pro life loser" seems insulting and unneccessary. Perhaps you could restate it?

That being said, it's a woman's right to decide what she does with her body, I am for abortions and all that jazz. I guess you'd call me "pro-choice" but I don't care for those labels myself.

I don't understand the age limit for this medication. If anything this pill should be made available to anonymous young mothers, they are the most likely to benefit from it in my oppinion. One of the major concerns I have is of course teen pregnancy, and as much as I'd like to believe that young men and women will miraculously become responsible, I hold no notions that accidents will occur. Younger couples are less likely to use condoms due to an inability or trepidation in purchasing them, are less likely to have access to birth control, and are less likely to inform a doctor (which really means informing the parents) when thye might need these pills. This pill could be some little girls last chance at a normal life, and it seems shame to deny it to her.

sorry...

Mesden 08-24-2006 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azisien
I'd say that's argueable. There are so many ways to have fun, or have a healthy sex life, without having an orgasm in a vagina, or vice versa. That might sound kind of contradictory in a way, if you consider a sex life to be ONLY intercourse, but in my experience the massive hormoral drives to mate can be satisfied without intercourse, and definitely go beyond simple masturbation.

Well, hey, you know, I agree with you there. But it's not like having sex contradicts that. And it's also the most conventional and first to mind procedure.

My point still kind of stands in the fact that taking away sex to someone that enjoys it can be bad, and regular sex IS still a good thing (Regular being, say, maybe once or twice a week. Maybe more, given your libido).

Seriously, ask Krylo. I mean, we talked about this not too long ago. But I'm not gonna share it without him being alright with it. It was pretty funny, but it'd get my point across.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.