The Warring States of NPF

The Warring States of NPF (http://www.nuklearforums.com/index.php)
-   Dead threads (http://www.nuklearforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=91)
-   -   Planning on buying a ps3? Read this. (http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=15931)

Grandmaster_Skweeb 11-05-2006 07:07 AM

Planning on buying a ps3? Read this.
 
Link
Quote:

It appears as though the Xbox 360 is not the only thing that is sucking a lot of power. According to IGN's recent update of PS3 Q&A, the second questions asks about the amount of power the PS3 consumes, the response:

Q: How much power does the system consume?
A: At most, about 380 W (60GB and 20GB)

Thats right. 380 Watts of Power, comparing that to the mere 45 watts that the PS2 uses. It uses twice the amount of power the 360 uses and just over 8 times the amount of the PS2. And after some hard mathematical equations, this means that if you play your PS3 every day for only 2 hours a day, it will cost you around $40 bucks a year in electricity bills.

Now I think that this means, because you have to pay almost $50 bucks to run your PS3, that's the reason why PS3 Online is free. Sony is rewarding you with free Online service, compared to the amount you pay for Xbox Live a year, just for paying the electricity bill for the PS3. Nice trade-off isn't it.
Yeesh, I think Sony is in cahoots with energy providers around the world.

Nikose Tyris 11-05-2006 09:37 AM

that doesn't compare to the cost of Xbox live at ALL. and I have 2-3 computers running in my house at any given time with 600w power supplies, so I'm actually not that intimidated. an extra $40 bucks isn't that bad.

greed 11-05-2006 10:19 AM

Curious, how much does the 360 suck? Power that is, I know the other answer, bada-dumpsh.
Nah it's a fine system folks, try the wings.

Post count mark = 500
Dispensing WOOT over arbitrary and meaningless achievement.

Krylo 11-05-2006 02:29 PM

WoW costs about $280 dollars a year to play (assuming you have a relatively small power source in your computer), yet no one complains about that... In short, I fail to see your point.

Fenris 11-05-2006 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krylo
WoW costs about $280 dollars a year to play (assuming you have a relatively small power source in your computer), yet no one complains about that... In short, I fail to see your point.

That's because it's WoW. People tend not to complain about WoW for reasons unknown to me.

But yeah, that's quite absurd, Skweeb. $40 bucks? For 2 hours a day?

Good thing I'm not planning on buying one. Besides, $600 plus $40 per month = more than I have.

Krylo 11-05-2006 06:01 PM

No, Fenris. Forty dollars a YEAR... which is roughly three dollars a month. Probably less as it's assuming you play for two hours every single day. I know my average on console gaming is considerably less than that. I may play for six - seven hours a day some days, but there are many many more when I don't even turn it on.

To put this in better perspective, your computer, more likely than not, has a 550 watt or higher power supply. This means that to run your computer for a year you're talking in the 70 dollar range, assuming you only have it on two hours a day. Assuming you're like most people and have your computer on all day, or even half a day... yeah, lets go with half a day...

You have your computer on for half a day, at 550 watts of power. That's 1.4 times the power 6 times as long--about 336 dollars a year, or twenty-eight dollars a month. In other words, running your computer like a normal person is costing you 8.4 times as much as running the PS3 would.

So, yeah, see the pointlessness?

Bells 11-05-2006 06:20 PM

Also... remember that the PS3 is "like" a computer.

...linux, internet, mouse, keyboard... yeah... a lot like a PC

The Artist Formerly Known as Hawk 11-05-2006 06:54 PM

The whole "PS3 is like a computer" thing is just crazy Kaz just trying to avoid paying some wierd tax bill as far as I'm aware. He did the same thing with PS2 and claimed it was a computer so he'd save lots of moolah.

$40. What's that in £ anyway, probably not much at all really?

And as for WoW, it's £10 a month; £120 a year, but the reason most people don't complain about the cost is because as I understand it around half the people who play it aren't the ones paying the money because their mostly younger people and it's the parents who are having their credit cards maxed!

As Krylo said, this is pointless talk.

POS Industries 11-05-2006 08:45 PM

On the WoW thing, if you're running your computer half a day every day, thus adding the average $280 a year to your electric bill, the fact that, at some point during that half a day that the computer is on, you're playing WoW is inconsequential to the electricity used to power the computer that you would have had on anyway. Other than that, $15 a month to play is a pittance that I, in my craptastic level of income, can still pay out of my pocket with no financial backlash. As for this'n:

Quote:

Originally Posted by FenrisWolf
That's because it's WoW. People tend not to complain about WoW for reasons unknown to me.

You know, I feel exactly the same way about RaiRO.

Back to the matter at hand: Yeah, this is silly PS3 bashing. I mean, I rather hope the PS3 crashes and burns as much as the next guy, but even I think this complaint is ridiculous.

Fenris 11-05-2006 09:39 PM

Sorry, misread the article. Excuse my mistake, O Krylo.

Still equals more than I have, so my point remains. It's an interesting little tidbit about the PS3. Heck, my lights flicker whenever we turn just about anything on in this house, so I shudder to think what the PS3 would do.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.