![]() |
Soldiers Say Army Ignores, Punishes Mental Anguish
Soldiers Say Army Ignores, Punishes Mental Anguish
by Daniel Zwerdling All Things Considered, December 4, 2006 Quote:
I'm not trying to pretend I have any idea what it's like being in the military but I know it can't be easy, it's a shame that people come back from that and this is how they're treated. |
This seems more like a specific place where this is happening, but its goddamn pathetic. The worst part is that it said the pentagon is denying all of this, they should be helping the soldiers, not denying that they have problems and then kicking them out of the army. This whole war is supposed to be about fighting terror, but theyre not even helping the soldiers.
|
Naw, it's pretty widespread. I mean, as per the above:
Quote:
Quote:
I have a story from a while back (will try to dig it up) about a guy who got pushed into taking a discharge on grounds that his PTSD was actually a pre-existing condition - which means he's screwed out of VA benefits, plus his chances of getting private insurance are pretty much nil. EDIT: Here's an Army Reserve lieutenant being court-marshalled for seeking out help for his PTSD. Also, more on that GAO report mentioned above: Quote:
|
Uncle Sam wants YOU.... unless you're a WUSS!
This sucks, but I personally know three people who have served overseas. Two are fine, and looked at it as a sort of vacation where the motorpool was occaisionally bombed, and one is emotionally F********ED UP, and will probably never be in an adult relationship ever again. He was kicked out, had a nervous breakdown halfway through college (with me), and just got his insurance salesmans license. Uhm.... well, to stay on topic, I guess I agree that, perhaps, things aren't working so well in the Army anymore. |
That shows how much the Army cares about the people who was not able to cope with PTSD. Now I'm not saying the Marine Corps doesn't kick out PTSD sufferors, but at least they try to help them. But punishing them? Hell, I'm surprised that they don't go to their superior's superior, Officer in Charge, or, from their unit's chaplin or medical officer.
You see, there's this process known as "Request Mast" which is a process where one can request time with the Commading Officer, and it's often used as a method to report hazing, and whatnot. Hell, imagine how many thousands of dollors went into training these guys, and when they come seeking help, they just get a boot shoved up their ass. If I found my unit was doing that, I'd just leave the first chance I got. [/slightMarinebias] |
This is exactly how it is. During my entire time in the military, for the males, it was "be a man, man up, tough guy". If you have mental difficulties, emotional troubles, etc, you're "not a man". Then they try to discharge obligations because with physical injuries, it's simple enough to tell when it's healed or at least patched up. With emotional ones, it could possibly never end. They don't want to be responsible for that, so they try to get rid of you rather than actually help.
What are you going to do, sue the military? They have your signature on a contract that basically says "whatever happens, happens". |
I think if it's more well known to the civilian population that the awareness of what's going on will help some of the soldiers that have been disgraced. People will have a better understanding of what's going on and hopefully be able to recognize that it's not the soldier's fault but the military's, leading to more benefits for the soldiers. I don't like the military, I don't like the way they handle people, treat people and run their operations. I particularly don't like that the guy who's running the whole show gets voted in and can have almost no experience in the military, but he gets to run the gambit? Atleast Washinton was a general. It should be possible to sue the military, the judicial branch is supposed to be a separate branch, to be there when the other parts of the government are f**king up. But that's a lot of power and money you're running up against. But with so many people coming out of the war, I a lot of civilians are going to see the results up close and personal, and then I think, hopefully, some of these men will get the justice they deserve.
|
Quote:
I mean in the vein of what flare was saying, you'd think even the most coldhearted calculus would acknowledge this sort of thing is if nothing else, a stunning waste of resources. Quote:
|
This is indeed sad. For the military to not help these fellows weakens itself, and when words breask out, the military is further weakened. Bueracracy chokes things, and nothing gets done. The Army is only hurting itself.
|
Wait, Shiney was in the military?
Anyways, my thoughts on this are rather complicated. I have some control issues (anger, frustration, generally related), and when getting yelled at for no reason, typically tend to do not nice things (or, in happy coincidences, not nice things happen to that person, such as falling into pool cleaning acid (true story)). Seems like the Army would hate that, huh? Anyways, as for what should be done about it, I think they're operating on the old ways, in which men were expected to be MEN, and not have any emotional problems or anything. Plus, it doesn't help to have a soldier break down in the middle of the battlefield... Edit: Y'know what sucks about being on pain medication? Your thought process turns to shit if you don't pay attention They need to realize that not everybody is a killer without remorse, and that many people tend to have sever trauma when they see themselves responsible for deaths and mayhem. Maybe get a few psychologists to help those who can't deal with it well? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.