The Warring States of NPF

The Warring States of NPF (http://www.nuklearforums.com/index.php)
-   Dead threads (http://www.nuklearforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=91)
-   -   Dr. Phil Kicks Guest Off Show (http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=16600)

Bells 12-13-2006 02:52 PM

Dr. Phil Kicks Guest Off Show
 
Direct from youtube
Dr. Phil Has The Creator of "Bumfights" Taken Off The Stage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNPvd...e=user&search=

Now... first... why the fuck there is a "show" called bumfights?

Secondly... attetion whore much, Dr Phil?

42PETUNIAS 12-14-2006 11:13 PM

I don't know, about an attention whore, if I was Doctor Phil, I would bring that guy on the show just to kick his fucking stupid ass off, as violently as possible. Not for attention, so that shitface could realize how wrong what he was doing is. Dr. Phil did exactly the right thing.

xravi 12-14-2006 11:47 PM

Some stuff the guy said in the video made me sick. Maybe Dr. Phill had him on the show so he could make himself look better.

42PETUNIAS 12-14-2006 11:52 PM

That guy makes everyone look better. Calling him terrible on the show and arguing with him would only give him attention, which is exactly what he wants. What Dr. Phil did was the exact right thing to do, and there are worse things celebrities have done to get attention than that. He did nothing wrong.

RaiRai 12-15-2006 12:43 AM

He did do something wrong. He had the choice to say no to this guest. Nothing forced him to bring this 'man' onto his show and yet he did. He then stated that he didn't want to bring attention to the guys acts, and yet he'd just shown footage of what he does to a live audience and cable TV. Does this sound like someone who didn't want a certain guest on his show?

Mesden 12-15-2006 12:53 AM

Well, it could've also been an act to demote his multi-millions of a company by just placing him BELOW the human standard, and Phil was showing that off WITHOUT giving him the attention.

I don't like Dr. Phil, but this doesn't seem to bad.

42PETUNIAS 12-15-2006 12:56 AM

Yes, but by bringing the guy on the show, and then having him sent straight off, he definitly made an effect on the guy, one that wouldn't have happened if he simply wasn't put on the show. Face it, it's a big show, having them say no is nothing special, and wouldn't have made any effect on that sick man. However, by bringing him on the show, and pointing out that his morals were so perverted that he wasn't even willing to talk to him, he showed the guy just how bad he was. The whole kicking him off was obviously planned out, but really, all it did was show the guy how sick he was, and in my opinion, that's a good thing, and a valid reason to support Dr. Phil.

Edit:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mesden
Well, it could've also been an act to demote his multi-millions of a company

So that guy really has a multi-million dollar company?! I could be wrong, but I thought he was exagerating or something, that is way too much for anyone to be able to make at that.

xravi 12-15-2006 01:01 AM

Unfortunately the guy was not really effected and just shrugged it off but, if he was to look back at the experience he might learn something, and then completely forget about it. *sighs*

42PETUNIAS 12-15-2006 01:06 AM

I doubt he was shrugging it off completly, a major celebrity just shut him down completly, he may have grinned for the cameras, but theres no real way to be happy when a guy kicks you off his show, and gets applauded for doing it.

adamark 12-15-2006 01:25 AM

Wow. This is the worst acting I've seen in a while.

I know they call it show-biz for a reason, and here's one of 'em.

This looks and sounds like tv show propaganda. Not the worst kind, but the entire thing looks staged, from the decision to put him on just to kick him off to the guest's very fake reaction.

There's no bad press. Dr. Phil just advertised for that guy.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.