Isn't the single greatest thing any of us have the finite time left in our lives?

.....but what if you were a lich and thus immortal for purposes of living on forever?

Isn't it possible that a lich would be concerned about time, if only to know when to hatch some zany scheme?

Wouldn't all that be a moot point if said lich could create his own demi-plane with the timeless trait?

Isn't that too broad of a hypothetical for us to be discussing, since no liches have bothered to tell us if they think that time matters in the first place?

Wouldn't it be better to suggest that it was too specific of a hypothetical question for us to be discussing?

But what if the Lich couldn't tell time?

What kind of a lich, that undergoes a unspeakably evil act to turn oneself into a lich in the first place, and has great spellpower wouldn't be able to tell time?

What if his watch had stopped and he hadn't had a chance to repair it yet?

Couldn't he just get a new one then or use a mending/make whole/fabricate spell to repair it?

Do fabricating spells really exist?

Isn't that how that make so many D&D books to put on the shelves of stores?

...It's not via printing press?

You didn't know that D&D books are crafted out of sheer complexity and overmodulation via black magic?

Are you sure it's not from a Legendary +4 Speed Press, printed on Fine Mithril Parchment?

You can make parchment out of MYTHRIL!?

Have you even thought about the complexity of growing mithril reeds before you inquired about mithril parchment?

Can I answer by saying I was thinking more in terms of a transmutation spell? :sweatdrop

What are the components required for that?

Would using psionics, by any chance, remove the need?

Can psionics affect a transmutation?

Don't they theoretically run on the same energy?

Where did you get that idea?

I don't suppose you've ever visited Zenhex?

Why would I visit Zenhex when we are speaking in WotCian?

Don't you mean NPF?

If I had meant NPF wouldn't I have said NPF?

Is this WoTCian thing what NPF is hosted by?

How can you not know that WotC stands for Wizards of the Coast, the company that owns D&D?

You were still talking about the Gigaxian view?

After seeing the turn of the conversation, who would like to get a D&D game together online?

It depends, who's running it and what level would we start at?

Does anyone want to volunteer?

How would our characters know each other?

Would anyone like to try a Gestalt game starting at level three?

(Honest, I think I could get OctRave to DM...)

Why should we Gestalt - can't we just do it the basic way without needing to uber-twink out characters?

Didn't you know that's how they're going to be doing things in 4.0?

Meh, why bother signing up for the Insider stuff when it's all going to be changed by the time they're done?

I'm guessing you've never heard of sarcasm when it's relating to gestalt being in 4.0?

Sarcasm on the Internet?

Why does the internet continue to hurt me?

If I'd be willing to play standard, would you guys still care to play?

(Oops, new post ninja'd...)

...Why can't you talk about D&D like the rest of us?

Didn't you know that going over the 1000th post in this thread might just be more important than D&D? No.....no it's not.

I can't see are we Title™?
 

If I answered in the affermative, would you believe me?

Are you a liar?

Wouldn't he say no either way?

Is this going to be a labrinyth scene with David Bowie rocking out in the background and very different Goblins to DnD ones?

would a lvl 5 paladin with a steel battle axe that does +2d Damage listening to Space Odyssey be able to hit a lvl 4 goblin with a roll of 14?

What class did the goblin have levels in?

Not only what class but what edition?

Couldn't we just assume 3.5 for simplicity's sake?

Do you know what they say about assumptions?

What who say about assumptions?

You're not familiar with the all-powerful figurative "they"?

Well when it gets right down to it aren't we "they"?

If we are "they", then who are they?

Do you mean who are we?

Are you telling me they are we and we are they?

Then what about us?

Who cares about us, what about them?

Aren't they the same as them?

Then does that in turn mean that we are them?

so if we are us and them are they who are us when we were them then?

Did we just break the English language?

Who's on first?

What's on second?

No really, who's on first?

Can't we get a play book to answer all these questions for us?

Seriously, what's the name of the guy on first?

Which game are we talking about?

How can you not be familiar with one of the most famous skits of all time!?

Doesn't the fact that I initially followed up with "what's on second" indicate at least some degree of familiarity?

Wait then Who's on third?

Haven't we made it clear that Who's on first?

Wait, where and what is the guy on first then?

Isn't it enough to just tell you that he's on first?

Who's on first?

Can we change the subject?

Wasn't who on third though?

ACCURSED NINJAS

Why can't you just accept that Who is on first?