The Warring States of NPF

The Warring States of NPF (http://www.nuklearforums.com/index.php)
-   Dead threads (http://www.nuklearforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=91)
-   -   New Jersey v. Don Quixote (http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=23016)

8 Man 08-11-2007 07:25 PM

New Jersey v. Don Quixote
 
The New York Times: Windmill Goes up, Neighbors Want It Down
Quote:

BEACH HAVEN TERRACE, N.J., July 10 — Tired of paying as much as $340 per month for gas and electricity at the Cape Cod home here where he has lived for 18 months, Michael Mercurio erected a 35-foot windmill in his backyard last fall that helped reduce his bill to about $114 — a year.

“It just makes sense,” said Mr. Mercurio, who is 61 and runs a company selling and installing windmills. “This is a clean, renewable source of energy.”

Some of his neighbors say it is also annoying. They say it is too big. They say it is too noisy. And some residents in this middle-class borough on Long Beach Island have gone to court to try to make him take it down, while the township has stilled it since winter.

It is a collision between the ideals of alternative energy and the suburban reality of New Jersey’s notorious not-in-my-backyard culture, casting Mr. Mercurio in the role of a latter-day environmental knight errant and his neighbor and principal adversary as the ecological equivalent of Cruella De Vil.

What started as one man’s attempts to find a cheap, clean energy source has become a frequent topic of coffee conversation among the small community of year-round residents in this town, where Mr. Mercurio has lived since he was 4, and has galvanized some segments of the state’s environmental community. And, oh, how the Don Quixote jokes have flowed.

“I hear it all the time,” Mr. Mercurio said, standing in the shadow of his still windmill Tuesday afternoon. “I tell them, ‘You’ve got it all wrong: I’m not fighting against the windmills, I’m fighting for the windmills.’ ”

The clash began in February when two of Mr. Mercurio’s neighbors filed a lawsuit in State Superior Court in Ocean County, charging that the township had acted improperly when it issued the permits that allowed him to build the weathered gray steel tower in his backyard.

The township has since agreed that it was in error. Its code prevents any structure from being built that exceeds 32 feet in height; with its 12-foot rotor blades, Mr. Mercurio’s windmill grazes 40 feet.

And this spring, the township’s council considered amending the code to keep windmills taller than 12 feet from being built. That proposal is pending.

But Mr. Mercurio said that he gave township officials the precise specifications for his windmill — which he called “just a tiny, little, itty-bitty thing” — months in advance of construction, and that he should not be held accountable for their mistake. “The town gave me a permit, and I built it,” he said.

“People have a right to use any resource on their property, just like oil, coal,” he added. “I don’t understand why they are against this. I really don’t.”

Maybe because, as Mr. Mercurio’s neighbors Patricia Caplicki and John Miller say in the lawsuit, in a 14-mile-per-hour wind, the three fiberglass blades produce noise greater than 50 decibels, the rough equivalent of light traffic or a noisy refrigerator.

The suit also says that the spinning blades throw “strobe-like shadows” on their property from noon to sunset.

“It’s not that we’re doing anything to stop the world from turning green,” said George M. Cafarelli, a lawyer for Ms. Caplicki and Mr. Miller who said he had asked them not to discuss the suit with a reporter. “We’re jousting at windmills which have been put up in inappropriate places.”

Richard J. Shackleton, the lawyer for the township, said that officials here were cognizant of environmental concerns and encouraged the use of alternative energy sources like solar panels. (Mr. Mercurio already has 56 solar panels on his home.)

But on a 21-mile-long barrier island that is home to about 9,000 people, Mr. Shackleton said, windmills present a safety hazard and disturb the aesthetics.

“If we had any areas on the island that are big enough to accommodate windmills, we would encourage their use, too,” Mr. Shackleton said.

Opinions about the windmill seem to hinge on how close one lives to it.

Mary Kopp, 81, Mr. Mercurio’s next-door neighbor, thinks that alternative energy “is something we have to look into,” but that his yard is “the wrong place for a windmill like this.”

Bill Kubarewicz, a contractor who frequently does work here but lives about 25 miles away in the Forked River area, said, “It doesn’t seem too bad.”

“I’ve heard it spinning,” Mr. Kubarewicz said. “It’s not like a helicopter or anything. But to live next to it? I don’t know.”

And Suzanne Leta Liou, a spokeswoman for the advocacy group Environment New Jersey, said simply, “We should be trying to maximize our wind potential instead of prohibiting it.”

Mr. Mercurio, who has one American flag flying from the windmill and another in his front yard — not far from a statue of a bald eagle — said that he was entitled to the same life, liberty and pursuit of wind currents as anyone else. “It’s like if my neighbor doesn’t like the color that I paint my house,” he said. “I have the right to paint my house red, white, blue, the whole Star-Spangled Banner if I want to.”

Mr. Mercurio, who used to work in construction and design, said that he first became interested in the possibilities of wind power about a dozen years ago, and four years ago started a company, Island Wind Inc., to help spread the gospel of clean, windblown energy. Also in his front yard is a handmade sign that reads, “Wind power makes America strong.”

Mr. Mercurio’s model, the Skystream 3.7, which is manufactured by Southwest Windpower, which is based in Arizona, can cost more than $15,000, fully loaded. The windmill, which generates about two kilowatts of power, can provide about a quarter of the energy Mr. Mercurio needs. The other 75 percent is generated by solar power.

The only fossil fuels that Mr. Mercurio uses are for the natural gas barbecue grill in his backyard and the stove in his home — hence, the utility bill that averages around $9.50 a month. But since the township shut it down in January, the windmill has not produced anything but controversy (Mr. Mercurio has been relying entirely on solar power), though its curved, clawlike blades, still whir in an occasional breeze.

On Friday, Judge Vincent J. Grasso of Superior Court suspended the suit against Mr. Mercurio and ordered him to seek a zoning variance from the township’s land use board. That board is expected to rule against Mr. Mercurio, probably sending the matter back to court.

As for Mr. Mercurio, he said the lawsuit was draining his retirement account and had him smoking Marlboros again.

“People always say, ‘Not in my backyard, not in my backyard,’ ” he said. “I want to flip it around. It should start in my backyard.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/ny...&ex=1341806400
A tip of the hat goes to this man for showing us that the pioneering spirit of our forefathers remains strong with us, even today.

adamark 08-11-2007 08:47 PM

That is freakin' sweet. I am really into green power. I think a 35-ft tall one is a bit excessive. You have to mind your neighbors. He should construct several smaller ones. Throw up a couple of solar cells, and maybe a stirling engine for good measure, and he can make that $114 per year go down to 0 per year, and even sell some electricity to the power grid and MAKE money.

ZAKtheGeek 08-11-2007 10:08 PM

Quote:

Maybe because, as Mr. Mercurio’s neighbors Patricia Caplicki and John Miller say in the lawsuit, in a 14-mile-per-hour wind, the three fiberglass blades produce noise greater than 50 decibels, the rough equivalent of light traffic or a noisy refrigerator.

The suit also says that the spinning blades throw “strobe-like shadows” on their property from noon to sunset.
Oh god no!!

But that's just an urbanite talking. I guess people that don't live in cities are more sensitive to these things...

8 Man 08-12-2007 12:03 PM

Additional details incoming, from his interview with CNN:
Quote:

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

JIM ACOSTA, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice over): In this breezy town on the New Jersey shore, when the wind is blowing, Michael Mercurio is thinking about saving money on energy.

MICHAEL MERCURIO, WINDMILL OWNER: My bill was running, for gas and electric, about $340 to $370 a month. Now I have a $9.50 bill a month.

ACOSTA: He built this 35-foot windmill in his backyard last year. Along with the solar panels on his roof, Mercurio has not only cut his energy costs, he sent power back to the local grid, especially when it's running at full speed seen here in this home video.

MERCURIO: The more power we can generate in our homes, the more free energy we have. It there for this country to use; it declares energy independence for this country.

ACOSTA: He had hopes of turning this trail blazing idea into a business. Building backyard windmills for homeowners across the country.

MERCURIO: I guess I'm a pioneer and I got a lot of hours in my back from it.

ACOSTA (on camera): Not long after wind power came to Long Beach Island, did a storm start brewing. It was the forces of nature versus the forces of -- not in my backyard.

BILL KELLY, WINDMILL OPPONENT: It's an eyesore. I think more importantly it's the noise that it makes.

MERCURIO: I believe that's false because it's no more noisy than an air conditioner.

ACOSTA: One of Mercurio's next door neighbors sued the local township, claiming the windmill exceeds height and noise ordinances.

GEORGE CAFARELLI, NEIGHBORS' ATTORNEY: Our claim against the township, they are not, or were not enforcing their own ordinances, allowing this thing to be built.

ACOSTA: The town ordered Mercurio to turn off his windmill until the matter is settled in court. A decision that environmentalists say blew them away.

SUSAN LITA LIOU, ENVIRONMENT NEW JERSEY: We want to see tests like this all over the country. We should be testing what our potential is for clean energy. Knowing Mike, I don't think he'll be deterred.

ACOSTA: They see Michael Mercurio as a modern-day Don Quixote.

MERCURIO: My answer to, not in my backyard, is, it's in my backyard and I want to keep it there.

ACOSTA: Instead of tilting at windmills, he trying to save one.

Jim Acosta, CNN, Beach Haven Terrace, New Jersey.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

Ryanderman 08-12-2007 12:11 PM

I hate the non-in-my-backyard mentality. It impedes progress where ever it pops up, and just strikes me as entirely hypocritical in nature. The same thing is happening near where I live. I live just south of Lale Ontario, and there is a huge fight going on in the towns along the shore about putting up wind turbines just off the beaches. It would generate a huge amount of electricity and low everyone's bills considerably, but of course the idea is intolerable because they're ugly. And kill seagulls apparently.

I say good luck to this guy in fighting to keep his wind mill. I fully plan on generating as much of my own power as I can when I own my own house, and it's people like him that need to pave the way for that to be possible.

Lady Cygnet 08-12-2007 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryanderman
And kill seagulls apparently.

I'd think that that would be a point in the windmill's favor. Seagulls around here are noisy and terrorize everyone, and they steal anything that they can easily carry. I have no idea why tourists find them so appealing. :stressed:

Anyway, it is important for everyone to do all they can to make environmentally responsible choices. Sure, Mercurio's neighbors may think that the windmill is ugly and noisy, and they may never be able to fly kites or release balloons near his yard, but using windmills and solar panels helps reduce the consumption of coal and fossil fuels to produce electricity. In fact, Mercurio ought to get a tax break for using alternative energy sources to power his house.

People need to get over the NIMBY BS. If the US is ever going to get away from using foreign oil or coal mined using methods that have cost people their lives, people need to start being responsible on an individual basis, much like Mercurio, and start using alternative energy sources.

Neighbors like Mercurio's are the main reason that my partner and I are planning on buying a few acres out in the country once we can afford to get a house. We want to be as energy efficient and environmentally friendly as possible, but we don't want to put up with a lot of zoning BS or neighbors who will gripe if we put up a windmill of our own.

Mirai Gen 08-12-2007 01:34 PM

Okay, the strobe-like shadows on the window, that could probably be really annoying.

But honestly, he said he was going to build it, it has been built, why are people getting all bitchy now? If the plans were taken up with the state and approved, what's the big deal?

Tendronai 08-12-2007 01:39 PM

I think it's wrong that Mercurio's ingenuity is being punished. He has a good idea on how to cut his energy costs, and yet his neighbors are complaining because they don't like how it looks. The entire "excessive height" argument is just the best way that they think they can get the windmill taken down.

If nothing else, Mercurio should be allowed to keep it solely because it is his property. The sound equivalent of light traffic is barely worth mentioning or complaining about.

It's a really good idea, one I wouldn't mind seeing implemented on a wider scale. Someone is trying to do something about the reliance upon conventional fuel sources, and he's being punished for it. The "not in my backyard" mentality really sickens me sometimes. In order to make progress, everyone has to make sacrifices.

Fifthfiend 08-12-2007 02:37 PM

I actually sympathize with the neighborhood residents on this one. NIMBY attitudes are easy to criticize when it's not actually your backyard, but when you can't sleep at night cause of your neighbor's windmill or the house you put your life savings into is worthless cause nobody'll buy a house with that thing towering over them it becomes kind of a thing.

Krylo 08-12-2007 02:40 PM

Quote:

If nothing else, Mercurio should be allowed to keep it solely because it is his property.
This is really the crux of it, right here, I think.

I mean, I could care less about the alternative energy and blah blah. I'm not much of an environmentalist. However, I am a big you-can-do-whatever-you-want-with-your-shit-ist. It's his property, and if it's no noisier than an AC, they have no right to complain. Just like they'd have no right to complain if he painted his house bright pink with yellow polka dots.

I mean, I don't particularly mind 'not in my backyard', when it's 'not in your backyard', that's when it gets annoying.

edit:
Quote:

but when you can't sleep at night cause of your neighbor's windmil
50 decibels isn't going to keep anyone awake at night. Like it says, a noisy fridge makes about the same amount of noise... so does a central air conditioner. I mean, are they gonna start going after people who want AC during the summer too?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.