The Warring States of NPF
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Warring States of NPF (http://www.nuklearforums.com/index.php)
-   Dead threads (http://www.nuklearforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=91)
-   -   Black Mage's contract (http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=2539)

Aerozord 03-15-2004 04:29 PM
sadly I agree. Lets face it he just puts in whatever he like to keep them valid. I bet he will ignore the death thing completely

The_Masta_Planna 03-15-2004 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klyco
Maybe BM will destroy it with a Fire Spell
He may, but even if he does, some where in the comic Thief mentions many many copies so either way BM and the rest are pretty much helpless

Yank 03-15-2004 10:32 PM
Maybe BM will destroy Thief with a Fire Spell

The_Masta_Planna 03-15-2004 11:05 PM
That could definitely do it, besides the fact that white mage would happen to be there conviniently to heal him back to health

01d55 03-15-2004 11:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRUSADER JOE
I believe the contract goes like this: "The party of the fifth part, hitherheretoforward hence refered to as the 'light warriors' shall do whatsoever the party of the first part, Thief, commands, under any and all circumstances, real or imaginary, throughout the universe and all possible and impossible variations thereof for all perpetuity."

If :bmage: is binded under all circumstances for all eternity, then how is it that the contract is no longer binding once he dies?
I remember that, but I cannot for the life of me find the episode in which it appears. If I ever do find it, I'll edit this post to link to it.

Of course, the main point is, this clause is very explicit in terms of "you can't get out of this." At all. Not only is it not possible, but you can't get out of it impossibly either.

Nosferatu 03-16-2004 01:03 AM
As per the "all purpose prove them wrong cluase" 84-b (epi 311) yes he is still under thiefs contract. For people who argue that hes not under his contral any more plz refer to article 84-A: no he is'nt

behemoth 03-17-2004 03:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosferatu
As per the "all purpose prove them wrong cluase" 84-b (epi 311) yes he is still under thiefs contract. For people who argue that hes not under his contral any more plz refer to article 84-A: no he is'nt
ROFL I forgot about that clause

Klyco 03-17-2004 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosferatu
As per the "all purpose prove them wrong cluase" 84-b (epi 311) yes he is still under thiefs contract. For people who argue that hes not under his contral any more plz refer to article 84-A: no he is'nt
WHo knows what thief will make up next when someone finds a loophole to that.

Nosferatu 03-17-2004 11:57 PM
Lol i saw this thread and remembered about that. Tell you one thing finding the episoad it was in was a pain in the butt.

behemoth 03-20-2004 12:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosferatu
Lol i saw this thread and remembered about that. Tell you one thing finding the episoad it was in was a pain in the butt.
what episode number was it?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 AM.
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.