The Warring States of NPF

The Warring States of NPF (http://www.nuklearforums.com/index.php)
-   Dead threads (http://www.nuklearforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=91)
-   -   The Dark Knight (http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=30095)

RickZarber 07-19-2008 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FenrisWolf (Post 811167)
Tuesday's a hell of a lot closer than August 21st. :B

...

. . .

Oh. A grave misreading, and I have made an ass of myself.

I am sorry Meister! I didn't mean to be an ass!

That's what I get for posting when I first wake up...

Masked Jedi 07-19-2008 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Thinking (Post 811306)
Well, the way I saw it was that when both he and Rachel were tied up, they went for Dent, that is what caused the hatred. Like, the scene where Batman tells him to shoot the people responsible instead, so he first shoots Batman, and then Gordon because he felt that they made the wrong choice since he pretty much lost everything because of who they decided to save

Yeah, well, that whole debacle could have been avoided if Batman had told Dent that he went to the place Joker said Rachel was, but Joker lied to him. Though Dent was batshit by that point, so it might not have mattered. Not that I'm criticizing it, because I thought that arc was handled beautifully.

Fenris 07-19-2008 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Thinking (Post 811306)
Well, the way I saw it was that when both he and Rachel were tied up, they went for Dent, that is what caused the hatred. Like, the scene where Batman tells him to shoot the people responsible instead, so he first shoots Batman, and then Gordon because he felt that they made the wrong choice since he pretty much lost everything because of who they decided to save.

Also, yeah, I just came back from watching the movie and the Joker was everything I expected and more.

Well, if you remember what Batman said when Gordon asked who he was going for:

"Who are you going after?"

"Rachel!"


Unsurprisingly, the Joker is a manipulative liar.

Lumenskir 07-19-2008 10:45 PM

I liked it, and I liked it a lot better than Batman Begins. No dicking around with origin was just fantastic.

Did get a tad Xanatos Pileup-y at certain points, but from my limited understanding of comics it was basically a movie that pitted "Guy who always has some crazy plan for everything" v. "The same guy in a bat suit" so I suppose it's understandable.

I liked that the Joker wasn't some byproduct of crazy extenuating circumstances...hell, I just never really cared for Burton/Nicholson Joker interpretation and this Nolan/Ledger version was alright in my book. Just the right amount of barely stable edginess I think. I dunno about all this posthumous Oscar talk, but then again I haven't heard of any really great movies to look forward to, so he might pick it up in a dry season.

The beginning did feel a little weird to me, and I think Nique might be on to something with the "Multiple beginning stacked on top of one another" theory, but looking back on it I can't really pinpoint which thread to cut short as they all did set up some part of the overall story. I think it might be because the early fight scenes were kind of clunky, but that was setup-ish too so I guess it wasn't too bad all things considered.

EDIT: Has there been any talk about who the next villains might be for the upcoming(?) movies? I only ask because my dad left the theater just knowing that the Riddler would show up in the third one, and I tried to explain why the more-realistic bent of the current movies would prohibit the character, but then I remembered that I know fuck all about comics that aren't the first four issues of Speedball so maybe someone out there wrote a badass/realistic version of a guy who basically tattles as a crime?

Masked Jedi 07-19-2008 11:18 PM

They haven't actually confirmed a third one. I mean, it's gonna happen, but we'll have to go through the whole Nolan won't commit to making it, so Bale and Oldman refuse to commit thing again. But I predict Riddler and Catwoman.

Kerensky287 07-19-2008 11:22 PM

I think they'll find it a little hard to make a third because at the end of the second, they basically said "We'll be fighting Joker for a long, long time." That might be a little difficult to arrange.

Though you never know, the whole Heath Ledger thing may just have been a massive publicity stunt... eheh... heh...

Regardless, we've kinda run out of Batman villains, I believe. The next step? Justice League. Go.

Masked Jedi 07-20-2008 12:47 AM

JL almost wasn't gonna happen. Both Christian Bale and Branden Routh said they wouldn't do it, and DC said they would make one without them and recast Batman and Superman, which would be blasphemy.

I'm not excited about this like I am Avengers. With Avengers, you've got the same creative team behind the movies, so they feel the same. I love both the new Superman and Batman movies, but they're worlds apart.

Nique 07-20-2008 02:04 AM

Quote:

I love both the new Superman and Batman movies, but they're worlds apart.
I disagree, because they are only 'worlds apart' insomuch as the characters are worlds apart. I think Superman's "tone" is, yes, a little overbearing to the more realistic approach of Batman, but when you consider the more outrageous elements of Batman and the more human parts of Superman, I think they meet in a crucial way.

Quote:

JL almost wasn't gonna happen. Both Christian Bale and Branden Routh said they wouldn't do it,
Can you provide a source for this? if it's true, this makes me sad for two reasons; 1) Routh was by no means phenominal in Superman Returns, but he also showed potential and I would hate to miss a chance to see an even better Superman performance by him if JLA was going to be the next DC movie instead of a Superman sequel. 2) An interaction between those characters by their respective modern actors would be outstanding, especially with a good director behind it (please be Nolan please be Nolan).

Kim 07-20-2008 02:23 AM

I think the next movie will have the Penguin. I want it.

Mirai Gen 07-20-2008 02:43 AM

For the record about the Dent/Rachel thing - All of the scene where Bats and Gordon are going after Rachel and Dent were trying to impress the fact that Batman was going after Rachel, but since Joker knew this he switched the locations he told Batman, which is why he saved Dent and Rachel died, thus sending Dent on the spiral into insanity since he knew Bats and Dent both loved Rachel. Thus, he could count on Bats going for Rachel, and Dent being horribly traumatized because of it.

In short, Joker is a brilliant bastard.

Quote:

EDIT: Has there been any talk about who the next villains might be for the upcoming(?) movies? I only ask because my dad left the theater just knowing that the Riddler would show up in the third one, and I tried to explain why the more-realistic bent of the current movies would prohibit the character, but then I remembered that I know fuck all about comics that aren't the first four issues of Speedball so maybe someone out there wrote a badass/realistic version of a guy who basically tattles as a crime?
There's been no talk of any sequel as of yet, but I think he's right saying that Riddler would be perfect right now.

They've done Dent, Scarecrow, Joker (who obviously can't come back unless recast), Ra's Al Ghul, and Falconey. These Batman movies are leaning more towards the realistic and I think it'd be hard for any audience to swallow a villain like Clayface.

Riddler, probably. Poison Ivy, maybe, but she could go either way since she could just as easily be 'immune' to organic poison and be able to just hide pills in her mouth or something.

Quote:

but looking back on it I can't really pinpoint which thread to cut short as they all did set up some part of the overall story.
I think if it felt clunky it was necessary to have it all at once since they had lots to go over later on.

And the only reason they put in the bookkeeper was to say, "Hey, you know, people on the inside of Wayne Enterprises actually are noticing occasionally, and here's what happens." Something the audience is no doubt wondering at some point.

Wyndon 07-20-2008 03:55 AM

I would love a Bane + Riddler duo.

That would be amazing. Or Mad Hatter + Bane. Or Black Mask and Riddler.

Oh dear god. No but seriously, Bane + Riddler sounds amazing to me.

Azisien 07-20-2008 11:04 AM

The moment the movie ended the second time all of my friends launched into a discussion of future villains. Sadly we aren't all that read up on the villains and all we could really think of were stupid ones. Though, as a follow-up to the Joker I thought it would be kind of neat to have Harley Quinn and someone else (Riddler or Bane is neat, yeah).

Masked Jedi 07-20-2008 11:25 AM

Catwoman and Riddler, guys. I'm tellin' ya. Romantic Interest and a fun villain. Plus, the books that inspire the movies (the Loeb/Sale graphic novels) just love Catwoman and the Riddler.

On the DC thing, I forgot to mention that both Bale and Routh have gone back on that and said they would do JLA. I was just annoyed that DC would do it without them.

Mirai Gen 07-20-2008 01:31 PM

Quote:

Catwoman and Riddler
I think this is the most likeliest of scenarios.

Lumenskir 07-20-2008 02:08 PM

I read an errand comment postulating that Will Arnett would make a great Riddler and now I want to track down the guy who made it for having the best idea ever.

However, as a guy who probably is pretty representative of the average superhero movie goer, how exactly does the Riddler differ from the Joker? I mean, I get that Joker is just batshit crazy and Riddler likes tattling, but for someone not versed in comic history lore I fear that we'll get "Crazy taunting psychopath 2".

I think Catwoman is a safe lock. Now that Bats is on the outs with society and currently has no one to pine for, cue the sexy and sympathetic thief he can hang out with.

EDIT: And to talk about the actual thread topic, something I thought was kinda funny at the end where Dent says he'll kill Gordon's most loved, passes over his wife, and then picks the kid with SAG card to threaten. I wonder how the unpicked kid felt after that, knowing forever that he wasn't the favorite.

Mirai Gen 07-20-2008 02:22 PM

The Riddler's big thing is that he's smarter than everyone else, or at least he thinks so. You know how Joker just likes doing things because he's Joker? Well Riddler likes to outsmart people, because he likes the challenge and would love to - at some point - to say he's smarter than Batman.

Nine times out of ten he just takes Batman and Robin and drops them into some sort of scenario that they have to think to get out of, deathtraps included, and Batman is the Detective so he just escapes anyway.

At least that's my understanding of it. I would love to see Nolan's take on Riddler, especially his costume.

I think Gary Oldman mentioned Riddler was a probability.

Frostatine 07-20-2008 02:55 PM

I think the cop ramirez would be a cool Harley Quinn. She's an established crooked cop, and has a weak will. Although she isn't blonde I don't really think that is much of an issue considering Dent wasn't dark haired.

I really would like Riddler and Catwoman. That, or Freeze and Joker/Quinn combo.

Fifthfiend 07-20-2008 04:16 PM

Closing for length and after I get back from seeing the movie I'mma read this thread and hand out warns for spoilers which if the general trend of things today holds there will be quite a few of.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.