Rhetorical and Controversial question. (Read before voting... like always).
 

Let me re-iterate on that a little clearer. If you pick yes, then you will know inside that you have let the lives of millions of people lived. But nobody would know that. They would only know that you killed the child. So you would be portrayed to the world as a brute violent sick killer, and you would be hated by everyone. You would be looked at as a menace to society, as Charles Manson is looked at.

However if you picked no, then nobody would know anything happened, but you would know deep down inside that you allowed millions of people to die just because you didn't want to lower your own image. So that would be pretty damn hard to live with. But so would being looked at like Charles Manson.

So... which one would you choose?

huh cancer isn't contagious

kill the kid, save the world.

tell everyone that the kid had cancer and yes, it can sometimes be contagious.

HAHAHAHAHAH NO it cant be

a friend of mine got cancer contagiously in the gonads. No laughing matter.

You can't take advantage or a rhetorical question like that.

It's either you are looked at as sick and disgusting, or you alone consciously know that you allowed many people to die.

It's like being asked "would you like ice cream, or a gun?" And responding "Ice cream, with a gun inside the cone."

what??? what kind of cancer

cancer in the gonads. I don't know!!

SKIN, PROSTATE, WHAT if you can't tell me that then how do you know if it is conagious