Clint Eastwood bothered audiences? I really couldn't tell.

Nameless heroes work quite often, not just when Tarintino thinks "Hey that'd be fuckin' cool!" and bleeps it out of the final cut.

Though of all things this doesn't bug me THAT much.

Clint Eastwood's character not bothering anybody was my point cause being mysterious was his purpose.
With the Prince being surrounded by people he knows it wouldn't make sense.

People he knows and that would usually call him by various titles!

Also, Dastan is "a Persian word, meaning story."

Nameless characters are usually mysterious. Dastan isn't mysterious, he's at home, so he gets a name.
Why do I even try to make a point when some people are just stubborn and twist my words?

Fight Club was pretty awesome.
 

They could totally hide his name away behind a legion of "Sire, sir, liege, prince, etc." Who needs a name when all your vassals can call you, "My Prince!"

I'd go even farther: it doesn't make sense to have a bunch of character acting familiar with the Prince of Persia for fifteen minutes at the beginning to establish a name the character doesn't need.

NonCon, you made your point well, as did Fifth, so I could accept that working in a film.

So I'm like the only person who actually played the damn game and listened to it? Because he was'nt at home but at another sultan's castle, visiting and delivering gifts. He was'nt surrounded by people, but mindless monsters who could'nt speak, and one girl who had never met him before. It does'nt make sense to give him a name in that context, since nobody present would either know, or be able to speak.

Bro, it ain't a straight adaptation cause that wouldn't work on screen. We know scenes will take place in his homeland.