| Magus |
09-10-2009 07:08 PM |
While I believe some doctors were recommending circumcision at one time I don't think they're doing it anymore, nor does every male born in the United States get circumcised, nor have they always been, even at the times when doctors were recommending it, or whatever. It's an argument that makes no real sense whatsoever.
And what about partial circumcisions, eh?
By the way, they demanded that Obama post his birth certificate on the internet, which he did. Does that mean they want him to post his...?
I think they're insane as usual. Hopefully this finally makes it obvious to everyone, even conservatives.
EDIT:
"Despite some controversy, it also has been widely practiced in modern times, especially in the United States, as a sanitary measure believed to give some preventive advantage against penile cancer and sexually transmitted diseases (studies have shown it to be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of HIV transmission, particularly among heterosexuals). Since 1971, when the American Academy of Pediatrics stopped recommending routine infant circumcision, the number of circumcised infants in the United States has slowly declined, although it is still above 60%."
So, uh, yeah, if this is actually worthy of knowing. In any case, even though Obama was born prior to 1971 there were still lots of people who were not circumcised.
Anyway. If he isn't circumcised, he's from Kenya, if he is circumcised, he's a Muslim. So I don't think it really matters which he is because the Birthers will read into it what they will.
And I mean, seriously, they want to know whether or not the President of the U.S. is circumcised or not? I mean, seriously? Why would anyone want to know that? On any planet in any universe?
|