I will then become a physical manifestation of your current avatar, bent only on causing you inhuman and endless amounts of mind-fucking pain.

So it's win-win for the rest of us?

Oh baby, don't tease me!

The best thing about the lack of a Discussion section is someone making Rick Santorum's "box turtle argument" in macro form in a thread with a relatively serious tone, and nobody objects, because it's in joke form! Classic stuff.

I think it's more that it was behind a swap tag and it was just easier to forget about it and pretend it wasn't there.

If it had been in the Discussion forum I'd have taken the trouble of either saying how retarded the argument was or saying how inappropriate the macro/joke form was (or more likely a mod would have.)

In the new era of general discussionism there's really no option that's worth the trouble when something that retarded comes up if it's formulated as a joke even remotely.

What was this argument exactly? As my arsenal of stupid arguments can always use more ammo.

Google told me that it's saying "If we let gays marry, then we have to let people marry multiple people, relatives, animals, and Matchbox® cars." I couldn't find its use in General, though I assume it's in the racist judge thread somewhere.

Blues posted it behind a swap.

Oh wow, my stepdad actually used that. He said gay marriage is the first step towards letting grown men marry little boys.

Again, save me.