| Magus |
05-05-2010 10:18 PM |
Well, when you put it that way I agree with you: boxers should wear steel gauntlets or fight bare knuckle. Actually, one hand should have a steel gauntlet and the other should be bare and part of the strategy is blocking with the correct hand at the right time or your bare hand is crushed by your opponent's gauntlet. Man, that would be an awesome sport, I'm going to propose we move to that one. Everything goes but blows to the head or below the belt, okay, and the object is to shatter your opponent's torso bones until the submit.. Man, this is going to be a great sport and I see lots of room for strategy and skill in it, too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stabbity death
(Post 1037154)
My father has always been a big boxing fan and has tried, forever, to get me into it.
I probably could, too. The fights are sometimes very exciting, and I understand the process well enough to follow along. The huge problem I have with it is that I strongly dislike any sporting contest which is likely to end in an arbitrary manner. The idea that the eventual outcome may be decided by a panel of judges (or ringside doctor or referee) makes the outcome less than legitimate to me, and I simply can't enjoy it knowing such an outcome is likely.
|
Oddly enough, I love arbitrary outcomes. It's odd. It's part of the reason I watch golf, half the time there is absolutely no reason for the ball to almost go in and then somehow skitter out but it happens sometimes, or why does the ball break for all the other players on a particular hole but then somebody will hit it apparently the same and it won't break at all. Poker is the same thing, there's so much to chance it's extremely enjoyable. It's just very enjoyable to me for some reason.
|