I love all of your opinions!
 

I don't understand why there has to be so much negativity out there. I think that Vash the Stampede had the right idea, "Love and Peace!" That being said:

Communism: Karl Marx had a great idea, and if it ever is executed correctly our workers paradise will be a dream come true.

Gays: Dude likes a dude, chick likes a chick, I say have at it. As long as you kids are happy, no one else should have a problem with it.

Politics: You know our best years were when Bill Clinton worked with a Republican Congress, of course trying to impeach him for questionable actiivities in the Oval Office derailed those good times. I think both sides should try to find common ground and help our slowly recovering economy get better. So instead of Republican hating Democrats and vise versa, they should just agree to disagree. Negativity from the likes of Glenn Beck and Keith Olberman (who really should go back to sports by the way) really turns me off.

Well I think I have an interesting thread started. So that is my challenge, you give me an opinion and I will try find a way to love it and you for having it. ^_^

Because most things are shit

Tag Request: BizzaroSMB thread. Their has been a lot of them lately.

Also I'm of the opinion that dialetical materialism has too much foundation in rhetorical opposites and would be more powerful if reformulated into logical opposites. What do you think of my opinion?

Does this make sense?
 

I would postulate that, considering the application of dialectical materialism, a foundation in logical, rather than rhetorical, contradiction would be impossible to achieve. While a physical force may have a logical counterpart, dialectic materialism is based around abstract social forces and interactions, the counterparts of which are rhetorical at best.

In addition, the weaknesses of dialectic materialism doesn't lie in the question of rhetorical/logical contradiction. It is my opinion that its entire basis is flawed, as it bases itself on a materialistic understanding of dialectics (rather than an idealist one), but then refuses to aknowlege the imperfection and inherent unpredictability of a materialistic model of society. It assumes dialectic change, but doesn't account for the possibility of social stagnation.

Edit:
What is your opinion on my opinion?

Edit2:
Except for cynicism, am I right?
Also, TOT4LLY D1GG1NG TH3 T3R3Z1 4V4T4R

My opinion is that you're not doing the thread right.

Also you are mad wrong

Your axioms are clearly flawed. Fallacies all up in this bitch.

OKAY BUT NOW REALLY MY OPINIONS OKAY HERE IT GOES

Babies. Taste. Delicious.
Agree.

Also, I'm pretty.
Agree some more.

I am of the opinion that your opinion of this threads opinions being love worthy is, in fact, wrong and therefore all opinions based therein are actually good and totally correct, (that is to say, wrong on all accounts).

You know what the difference between you and me is?



http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/8936/mibsmith.jpghttp://img814.imageshack.us/img814/2258/idgaf1.gif

I'm of the opinion that fallacies are the only true representation of reality.

Also cause I like dragging threads into the gutter rightfrom the start:
I'm of the opinion that the allies were as villainous as the Nazis during world war 2 and the outcome of that was an immense massive world tragedy and not a triumph.

By December 22 we should really have a Free Hugs thread going on around here.

Paradox waiting to happen.