![]() |
Light Bulb Ban
Video on Colbert report
FOX is arguing against something that doesn't exist. So does the Heritage Foundation there is this Blog, Band the Bulb, that is Pro the phasing out of Incandescent lights Wikipedia has a very nice article about the whole deal from a Global point of view And the Huff Po has the story from Calinfornia's point of view And CNN money think it's a bad idea So, all those links come down to the latest silly Power struggle in the global scenario... how can people oppose something like this? New technology, better technology... shouldn't we have better standards for efficiency than we had 100 years ago? All and all, it's blown being all proportion and made into "this week's outrage" and i hope it stops at that. Because it really seems like a silly argument... also i don't know why Fox is fighting against it... this one was signed and brought in by Bush... doesn't that goes against their narrative? |
Honestly, I don't see a reason for the law to ban the old bulbs. If it's better for consumers, people will switch over, and if not, I'd rather not have the old ones banned.
I mean, there are places where the old incandescent lights shine (Hah! I am funny!), and there are places where florescents make much more sense. I don't think that we should ban one, just because the other is a better fit in general. |
That... What...
No? Let's go with 'No'. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And again, it's not like incandescents are being banned. Just inefficient ones. And I cannot think of a good reason to not do that. Edit: I'm not a hugely passionate fan of fluorescent lightbulbs. I just find them strangely attractive. I MEAN I JUST DON'T LIKE OBJECTIVE MATTER BE PRESENTED IN A SUBJECTIVE LIGHT. Which Fox is doing right now. It's honestly kinda silly, acting like this is a big deal. It's lightbulbs, it's a really gradual shift. There's no reason to not do it. Bluh. |
All I know is that I used to change one of the two bulbs in the ceiling lamp in the main room in my apartment about every 7-10 days until I switched to CFLs. That was in 2005, and since then I've had to change one of them. No matter what they cost and how complicated they are to discard, it's going to be both cheaper and easier than incandescent bulbs in the long term.
|
An argument for keeping incandescent bulbs.
|
But I can still use them for when I get ideas, right?
|
Here's something to consider for the environment: fluorescent bulbs all contain mercury. Incandescent bulbs all use the much more environmentally-friendly tungsten.
|
Quote:
|
I'll be entirely honest: I don't really care either way what light bulb I'm using. I am, however, mildly irked that one of the florescents that I've bought did not last ten years, and in fact burnt out rather quickly in my desk lamp.
Granted, I think there was something wrong with the lamp in general, as leaving it plugged in when it was off blew a circuit. I've since stopped using it. |
but the pig tails are ugly
ugly like your face |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.