![]() |
Facebook defaces Google's locker, passes notes in study hall calling goog "LAME-O"
No seriously what the fuck is this I don't even
Quote:
Quote:
It doesn't even amaze me that they would do this so much as that they would do it so badly and then get so openly caught out doing it. Like apparently the entire plan was "pay these guys to call a bunch of newspapers, and tell those newspapers 'yo google sucks, you should do a news story about how google sucks'". And I mean even that would maybe have worked except for some nutty reason they called competent, ethical writers, who then went "who the fuck are these guys" and tracked this back to where it came from. ...Fun fact, apparently this company that Facebook hired is run by... the same guy that ran Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. I MEAN, REALLY GUYS Hire someone who knows how to, like... succeed at things, next time? |
....Wait, so Facebook honestly considers Google to be a "competitor" on the social networking scene?
|
Wow. Words fail me at the amount of derp that story has.
|
Google just do Google things and put Google ads on FB and don't do another FB
Quote:
I know Google has things they want users to be doing with their accounts, but I would hardly call instant messages and email "social networking". Does anyone even use Google Buzz? e: I mean Social Circle isn't even anything more than adding additional things to your searches when logged in. Logging in to a Google account and using Google already does things based on your profile [if you let it, anyway]; why do they think this is even invasive? It's not even as annoying as FB trying to tell me to like pages just because friends do and doesn't seem* to stalk people as much as FB does with its reporting of every picture, wall, and so forth friends comment on. * I don't stay signed in to Google when doing anything other than reading email or checking a calendar, and I use GTalk via IM clients and not my browser. As such, I don't really give Google much to work with and might be missing out on what they think their social search features can do for me. Man, if I had to see feeds and wall posts when logging in to check email I would have to consider a different email provider. |
Quote:
as for Facebook, well they probably just dont care if they get caught. They survived it being revealed that they illegally used peoples e-mail accounts and passwords and you think this will phase them? I doubt anything can really bring down facebook. |
The thing with Google is they've got the ad-supported internet search business locked down and can continue taking as many pokes at other people's business models as it takes until they punch through. Google Buzz was a big stupid failure but that doesn't mean their next attempt won't bite a huge chunk out of Facebook's business.
|
What I find funny is that Facebook is basically the king of invasion of privacy and internet stalking, and what they tried to accuse Google of was exactly that.
|
www.orkut.com <-- Guys... owned by Google. This is what Facebook is trying to "destroy" from the competitors table.
I use this for around 6 years now, and... honestly? Not better. I think Facebook sucks, TBH. But Orkut is not better. |
Yeah, you gotta remember that google doesn't just mean google, it means google and everything google owns. Which is quite a large portion of everything.
|
On the other hand, Facebook is social networking. Google's social networking site is Orkut. Did anyone even know about Orkut before Bells linked Orkut?
That's like McDonald's getting worried that Jimbo's Salad Hut with all of one location in rural Illinois is going to cut into their profit margins enough for them to start a smear campaign about how Jimbo's throws all kinds of chemicals into their salads to make them addictive. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.