![]() |
Cooking should be a recognized art form
Seriously, hear me out on this. "Art" in many ways is about expression and getting a response from others, usually through visual or audio cues. Now when you cook something you often do the same thing. You can even see genres of food preparation, be it food that looks gross but tastes excellent, or food based on nostalgia, or even on being as foul as possible. Lets not forget pretentious meals that people eat because its fine cuisine but is at best shallow.
In many ways a chef does with food what one might do with a movie, but with smell and taste instead of sight and sound. |
It already is!
Culinary ARTS |
How is it not recognized as an art already? Culinary ARTs schools disagree with you. The difference is the food is consumed in restaurants instead of displayed in museums.
Sure, your run of the mill chef might not be able to elevate food to the kind of memorable experience that art should impart, but that's why you go to the good restaurants. Edit: ninja'd Also: http://img859.imageshack.us/img859/8910/artcr.jpg |
Its more like performance art than anything. It rather different from more convential arts because the food doesn't last, it's also limited to one person as a full experience.
So whatever you make is fleeting and limited and the culture/fame is limited to the chefs. As we do now |
No man you don't get it, man. It may be considered art at art schools but it's not considered ART art, you know, man?
Like this grilled cheese sandwich I'm eating? God damn Picasso. |
Quote:
So obviously all we need to do is use highly advanced nanotechnology to exactly duplicate food on a molecular level. Its not rocket science |
We might as well replace the "Rocket Science/Brain surgery/Rocket Surgery" analogy WITH nanotechnology. Because at best they are dealing with a simple chemical reaction and at worst they are dealing with things that would blow people's MINDS.
|
Quote:
|
It may just be because I like the things I make to be lasting, but it makes me sad to think of cooking as a fine art. It might just be the fleeting beauty of it that makes me sad. But people cook thousands of millions of meals every day. If a few Grapes of Wrath or Breakfasts at Tiffany's* get eaten every now and then, what difference does it make to anyone who's not there? To anyone a hundred years later? Doesn't it break your heart to think about all these treasures that are lost forever?
|
But seriously his stuff is pretty cool
Quote:
Do you really want food to be lumped in with a bunch of crazy people? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.