The Warring States of NPF

The Warring States of NPF (http://www.nuklearforums.com/index.php)
-   Bullshit Mountain (http://www.nuklearforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   "All of you people are fat and clogging the internet!", Internet Upgrade Thread (http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=41847)

Aldurin 06-06-2012 01:22 PM

"All of you people are fat and clogging the internet!", Internet Upgrade Thread
 
So apparently we've got too many people in this world with too many devices and servers and shit, and now companies like google are having to transition to IPv6 cause of you guys.

This should hopefully keep the internet from hitting capacity for another 10 years. But still, stop being so fat on the internet, there's a finite amount of space there.

Ryong 06-06-2012 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aldurin (Post 1201402)
This should hopefully keep the internet from hitting capacity for another 10 years.

Quote:

340 trillion trillion trillion
More like 100. Or 1000.

Doc ock rokc 06-06-2012 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryong (Post 1201404)
More like 100. Or 1000.

actually with the near exponential rate of technological advancement 10 years is a nice estimate.

Geminex 06-06-2012 02:58 PM

Quote:

actually with the near exponential rate of technological advancement 10 years is a nice estimate.
>: ?


Amount of new addresses available:
Quote:

3.4×10^38
Estimated amount of bacteria on earth:
Quote:

2.3x10^40
Basically, every hundredth bacterium could buy itself an iphone and we would still addresses to spare.

And all the other bacteria would hate the 1% that keep showing off their new iphones.

Edit:
Seriously, 7 billion people. In 10 years' time, maybe 8 billion. That's 8x10^9.
Each of those people would have to buy roughly 4x10^28 networking devices for this to be full.
Humans have about 100 trillion cells (10^12).
That means we'd have to own more iphones than we have cells.

Unless we actually come up with workable networking nanobots (which I don't think is all that likely), I don't think we're in danger of breaking the limit anytime soon

shiney 06-06-2012 03:13 PM

Yeah, this isn't the same as the growth in processing requirements or anything. This is like saying "We're almost out of houses, build enough houses to cover the entire sun a hundred times over".

Revising Ocelot 06-06-2012 03:18 PM

I'm pretty sure this is all false. How can you get trillions of tubes going into my house and back?

Geminex 06-06-2012 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revolving Ocelot (Post 1201412)
I'm pretty sure this is all false. How can you get trillions of tubes going into my house and back?

You gotta make them real small

Edit: But not too small. Otherwise you can't pump the information through them anymore

Ryong 06-06-2012 03:34 PM

I thank Geminex for showing the sheer scale of this change.

And also:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geminex (Post 1201407)
Unless we actually come up with workable networking nanobots (which I don't think is all that likely), I don't think we're in danger of breaking the limit anytime soon

We'd still have the whole weird LAN masking shittick so even then it'd work for a bit.

Sifright 06-06-2012 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geminex (Post 1201407)
>: ?


Amount of new addresses available:


Estimated amount of bacteria on earth:


Basically, every hundredth bacterium could buy itself an iphone and we would still addresses to spare.

And all the other bacteria would hate the 1% that keep showing off their new iphones.

Edit:
Seriously, 7 billion people. In 10 years' time, maybe 8 billion. That's 8x10^9.
Each of those people would have to buy roughly 4x10^28 networking devices for this to be full.
Humans have about 100 trillion cells (10^12).
That means we'd have to own more iphones than we have cells.

Unless we actually come up with workable networking nanobots (which I don't think is all that likely), I don't think we're in danger of breaking the limit anytime soon

even switching to IPv6 isn't strictly needed (right this second) with proper network address translation(which is being used now) You could avoid this problem for another couple of years.

IPv6 will be all we need for the forseeable future unless they start assigning ip addresses to peoples clothing.

Edit: Basically gem is totally right and any one thinking that we will magically have even a million devices on the internet per person is deluded.

Ryong 06-06-2012 04:09 PM

Man you know how patchy NAT is, Sif.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.