![]() |
Order and Chaos: Source of both Creation and Destruction
I assume you know of the meta-physical concepts of Order, chaos, creation, destruction. First to break things down. Order is logic, control, and law. Chaos is emotion, freedom, and anarchy.
Now humans naturally have both elements, as does society as a whole. However I began looking at how these two conflicting concepts interact in the human psyche. More spacifically my own. I am a person who has high pressence of both concepts. I have found in any, and especial conditions like mine, there are two out comes and as a rule both are present in everyone. When two oppisite forces meet each other the result is often destruction. A personified example would be what happens when you shove a hippy and a conservative into the same room and say, "how do you feel about legalizing drugs". Nothing gets acomplished and only conflict and destruction can result. However there is of course a another outcome. You can merge the concepts melding them into one and embrasing the best qualities in both. My example is invention. Without the imagination of chaos nothing new can come forth, but without the logic of order you can never make the idea work. Thus both creation and destruction can both be created by the opposing forces of Order and Chaos. well thats all I am saying for now. Please forgive any misspellings. I just had to put this concept on the floor, sure most of you already realized this. oh and foot note I didn't know where to stick this paragraph These two forces can never truely overcome the other. In a tyranical society for example, anarchy and freedom movements take place and topple such reigms. In a case where there is no control leadership will take place and humans natural desire for order creates law and structure. |
OK but you never really asked a question or anything. This is a statement. What are we supposed to talk about. Its like.... yeah, ok, and... whats your point.
|
I might as well say something. Nietzsche said that mankind does not have the capacity to improve but only to destroy an recreate. Without destruction there can only be stagnation. But through destruction we can rebuild and create. I wouldn’t say its 100% true, but about 87%.
|
Well... if we're looking at matter, technically, regardless of what we or anything else does, things will always eventually descend into chaos. Chaotic systems are innately much more stable than ordered systems, due to the lower level of potential energy contained in a chaotic system. The Second Law of Thermodynamics covers this.
Quote:
Entropy always wins. Time makes fools of us all, it seems. |
actually my point was not that of nature itself. Laws of physics govern everything. Random events are simple illusions that we precieve of random (chaos theory).
I am making the point of human thinking and society. Oh and there is no question. I just needed to vent is all. If you wanna discuss go ahead |
Humanity is part of nature, is it not?
As above, as below, eh? What applies to the greatest scale of things applies to us lowly humans as well no? My point was that it takes extensive effort to keep some sort of order to things, and if that effort (or energy) is removed, everything crashes down. The most fascist governments have to keep a near-constant watch on the people of that nation because the smallest chink in that effort could make the entire system crumble to dust, at least until another person or group expends the energy to bring back some sort of order. |
Let me say this:
Humans don't understand random, our brains work off connections and draw conclusions. |
About law and chaos, I feel that there is a balance between them. Without order, what would be chaos? Without chaos, what would be order? It's all a matter of perspective. Too much of either is devastating, as seen by dictatorships (order) and anarchies (chaos).
It's the same with creation and destruction too. Without creation, there is nothing to destroy. If nothing is ever destroyed, there is nothing new to create. Wihout both, neither can exist. If you can't tell by now, I typically play true neutral characters ;). |
First of all chaos is not emotion, freedom, and anarchy. Or at least acorring to me. What you described would be more along the lines of pre creation. Or the planing of creation. But I see chaos as this
Now the wayyou describe chaos I think you could be droped of in the middle of nowhere and have to survive. You'd have freedow to plan live and create a house, a home, a life. Make tools to survive. With your order you use the laws of nature to live. Also I belive this is another way to describe Chaos *Spolier for gamers* (Invisible) HP:20,000 ATK:170 ACC:200 DEF:100 AGI:50 INT:40 EVA:100 M. DEF: 200 GIL:0 EXP:0 TREASURE:None |
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.