View Single Post
Unread 03-01-2010, 05:33 PM   #11
Geminex
SOM3WH3R3
 
Geminex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Geminex slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay!
Default

I agree with Smarty on the genism bit. You can modify a person's genotype, theoretically anyway. What you can't do, is control the factors that influence the phenotype. And they have so much more influence on a person's... identity, really, than the genes. Sure, you can eliminate certain genetic diseases through genetic modification. And perhaps you can even modify some physical traits, though the interaction of various transcribed proteins are so complex, you'd need one hell of a research budget to manage this. But an individual's behavior, how they will act, who they are, that, I believe, lies in the phenotype.

Edit:

Though I would be interested in some more info on the affirmative-action plans and the ineffectiveness thereof, that smarty mentioned.

Last edited by Geminex; 03-01-2010 at 05:35 PM.
Geminex is offline Add to Geminex's Reputation   Reply With Quote