So reading the article basically this started because a girl conceived using donated sperm wanted to meet her father, and the doctor wouldn't give her the information because the donor wished to remain anonymous? And now the court is saying the girl is in the right?
That's a bunch of bullshit. You have every right to remain anonymous, just because you donate sperm - a fairly charitable act, monetary gains aside - doesn't mean you should have to deal with a kid down the line just because "I NEVAR MET MY REAL DADDY!!1!"
|