Thread: "Inseminated People Given Same Rights As Adopted People" or "Why Wasn't This Law?"
View Single Post
Unread 06-01-2011, 12:23 PM   #8
Professor Smarmiarty
Sent to the cornfield
 
Professor Smarmiarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: K-space
Posts: 9,758
Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law.
Send a message via MSN to Professor Smarmiarty
Default
I totally support the right to remain anonymous. Your biological parent is pretty meaningless as n entity and certainly not enough to override their right to not have any contact. Doubly so if they gave under the assumption that they couldn't be contacted.
If the law was changed so donors couldn't get guaranteed anonymity nd if that was the case I would be ok with it, I'm not particularly strong eith way, but I wouldn't like this to happen for two reasons- 1) The point above and 2) You would lose sperm donors by the bucketload.
Professor Smarmiarty is offline Add to Professor Smarmiarty's Reputation   Reply With Quote