I suddenly realize that I just tied my credibility to earl.
Why can't I keep my big mouth shut.
In all seriousness, though, I am glad that people are holdin' off. Admittedly when I made my post, I hadn't really considered Nik's argument that killing earl could deliver some working knowlege of the game's setup, which would be pretty neat. Neither had I considered his "fuck you guys" as anything other than a joke, because that's kinda the way he rolllls. I think.
I mean, I still think we have better leads. Like IHM-"let's blanket-lynch anyone who makes a particular roleclaim, even when there's a good chance we'll waste at least one lynch that way because hey they might be scum"-N. I mean, aside from the dude's overly long middle name, it just seems weird that he'd propose to lynch earl on such minimal evidence. It is day 1, but earl's claim was more of towntell than a scumtell in any case. He's a strong player, and I guess I'm sorta still giving him the benefit of the doubt?
But the fact that he's a usually strong player makes that particular screwup all the weirder. It doesn't make sense.
What would make sense would be a scum-aligned IHMN trying to use his reputation for getting stuff right to push an early lynch on earl.
So, because my flight leaves at 9 AM tomorrow, and I'm probably not gonna get online again for 24 hours, I'm gonna VOTE: IHMN
I am not at all sure about this, but, for now, it's the best lead I can think of.
|