View Single Post
Unread 05-24-2012, 11:55 PM   #4
Bells
That's so PC of you
 
Bells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: In a Server-sided Dimension where time is meaningless
Posts: 10,490
Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay! Bells slew the jabberwocky! Callooh! Callay!
Send a message via MSN to Bells Send a message via Skype™ to Bells
Default

yeah i still think it's the wrong approach... it's just too fast. Every core set rules is going to have problems, holes and issues in them... instead of infinite padding and gimmicky nonsensical bullshit, they should release a workable, solid base of rules set and them work on options, content and lore...

as far as people have been rolling dice they've been ok with tweaking the rules and adapting to their own table, and it gets better the more options they are given to work with... by recycling everything over and over they are just segregating their playbase... afterall, all those books aren't exactly super cheap.

I'm pretty sure a lot of 4e early adopters are going to give 5e the cold shoulder, just like the 3e crowd did with 4e
__________________
BELLS STORE : Clothes! You wear them!

Bells is offline Add to Bells's Reputation   Reply With Quote