View Single Post
Unread 10-29-2009, 12:41 PM   #6
Professor Smarmiarty
Sent to the cornfield
 
Professor Smarmiarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: K-space
Posts: 9,758
Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law.
Send a message via MSN to Professor Smarmiarty
Default

Well the most common view is this:
Scientific laws are collections of data into concise mathematical or verbal statements that are related to directly causal relations. They do not explain things.
Theories explain things.

I'm a bit radical in that I reject the notion of scientific laws, but even under the general classification gravity is a theory and not a law because it explains why things are attracted to each other. You could have like the inverse square law- which explains the strength of attraction with distance but you cannot explain it in a law.
Professor Smarmiarty is offline Add to Professor Smarmiarty's Reputation