Quote:
Originally Posted by Azisien
Hey! Hey! Anarchy just means no leader or no leadership. I hate the connotation those evil non-anarchists have created with anarchy necessarily being total chaos.
|
If Anarchy just means no dominant system of government, and everyone stays occupied with their own lives, then I'm sure the system might work out fairly well. Especially on a small scale, like a village or something. This is, of course, ignoring that people tend to build hierarchies around themselves, even when they don't need one.
But, Anarchy's probably not quite as effective at doing something on a large scale.
'Course, democracy's really slow about doing just that too. Might be worse at it.
Quote:
|
Maybe democracy is total chaos huh, how about that? Huh? Punk?
|
Well, since I don't see looting in the streets, blood on the sidewalk, or fire!
I'm gonna say no.