Well, full blown, original minded, large scale Anarchy is not really self sustainable. Because we're not equal. Some of us are indeed better than others. Both Physically and mentally, so, as the mass becomes larger, it's only natural for the "weaker" ( i use the term loosely, just to illustrate) to gravitate towards those they found to be "stronger" .
There you stabilish a moral chain of command, which then should generate positive and negative feedback and relationships, which would then define a chain of trust. Thus, creating a "Line" of command that can define itself in the present and for the future.
At that point, you don't have Anarchy at all, you have a fragmented society made of "Hubs" of power that will, naturally, at some point collide and clash or ally or disband to another territory.
And at THAT point you already have another form of Goverment stabilished. Raging from pure Tyrany right up to full blown democracy. It just depends of the social enviroment and they people present at the time of conception.
|