Quote:
Originally Posted by Krylo
See that's my problem, is that the 'anarchy' would be short lived in all but name, as the corporations founded to handle things like security quickly take any and all power they want and take the place of government, as that any time you have capitalism you have competition and therefore have people/entities trying to do better than each other. This inevitably leads to seeking more power.
It's why anarcho-capitalism has always sat poorly with me.
|
I guess you could hope that people would start seeing the corporation as "the man" and actively resisting. I don't think that idea holds much water though.
Really, it seems like all forms of anarchy suffer from one flaw: Someone's going to be looking for power. You'd need something to prevent that, but that would require some organization, which is counter to the point of anarchy. I've never seen anyone argue for a version that didn't contain this. It's...hard to imagine one, honestly.
EDIT: Ninja'd twice. Ah well.