|
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sent to the cornfield
|
![]()
So this video has been making the rounds, featuring a person supposedly drawing two portraits at once, one with either hand, and I call absolute bullshit. When drawing, I focus so hard on the spot I'm drawing that something falling on the paper a few inches away can go unnoticed. This is why artists need to occasionally hold a drawing at arm's length so they can view the whole thing without tunnel vision. And these are detailed portraits with shading. Even without tunnel vision, you can't focus on two spots at once enough to see the shading properly enough to draw it. Try reading two pieces of text at once on two different parts of a page.
So I call shenanigans. I've also been looking at the hands and the left hand looks significantly less feminine than the right, to me (look at the arms, in some parts). But maybe I'm biased. What do you guys think? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Local Rookie Indie Dev
|
![]()
I think that if this is real then I desprately must learn how to do this. I might give it a try later. I got a bunch of stuff I wanted to draw and this could be a very useful technique for me.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
si vales valeo
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Where US HWY 59 and 80 cross
Posts: 4,470
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
That really looks like two different people's hands to me, but I can see this being real. I've seen similar things in real life done by ambidextrous people.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Sent to the cornfield
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 870
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
they alternate between working on one portrait and then the other. its really obvious in the beginning; when one hand is moving, the other is not, and vice versa. note that towards the end, when the portraits get really detailed, they abandon the concept entirely and start using both hands on one portrait while not touching the other at all.
you just don't notice because this is probably several hours of work time-lapsed and compressed into a few minutes. Quote:
Last edited by stefan; 12-18-2011 at 03:40 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
Objectively The Third Worst
|
![]() Quote:
Also: Quote:
Really? I can't do an Ollie therefore EVERY SKATEBOARD TRICK VIDEO IS FAKE.
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Sent to the cornfield
|
![]() Quote:
Which I don't know seems perfectly reasonable. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
rollerpocher tycoon
|
![]() Quote:
I haven't actually watched the video linked in the OP, though, so the guy may very well be bullshitting. I'm just saying that it's possible and not really hard to conceive of someone who can draw in such a way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
That's so PC of you
|
![]()
i think there is a trick, but i don't think it's... actually fake. I mean, the guy has several videos on his account, and only a couple are 2 hands drawing... it's too clever of a ruse to be true.... i say it's probably in the time lapse, that's where the trick lies... if you saw it in normal speed, maybe he alternates speed and focus from one side to the other, and when the video gets speed up, it creates the illusion of being seamless...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
synk-ism
|
![]()
Doesn't Demetri Martin draw with two hands in his bits? I know those are hardly as detailed, but I'm just trying to cite an example that this kind of thing has been done before (I suspect there are other videos out there, though I've not gone to look) -- i.e. it doesn't require some kind of "trick". Even if the person isn't focusing on both hands in real-time, it's still impressive that either hand seems to be capable of the same level of detail work in the drawing.
__________________
Find love.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Archer and Armstrong vs. the World
|
![]() Quote:
And yeah, an ambidextrous person could focus on one drawing at a time and do two drawings. I guess what the "trick" is it appears that they are focusing on two drawings simultaneously when that is pretty much impossible. They would have to switch their attention back and forth. So it's still impressive, just not as impressive as some people might think. Kind of like if you could walk on water for a minute or whatever, instead of all day. Still pretty darn impressive. It's just not AS impressive.
__________________
The Valiant Review Last edited by Magus; 12-21-2011 at 01:33 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|