My Little Pony: Friendship is Mafia

[Sifright]

Right Hawk's points are I'm suspicious of people voting to kill inactives, and bullshit about me calling on the PO to confirm me which i've never once asked for. Also hawks another low activity poster.

HOS:Hawk

[Sifright]

but more importantly When should power roles like the PO reveal them selves because this is a question that does need answering.

The PO has a high chance of being dead the next day, If he doesn't give his information either this game day or the next we WILL lose his information.


So okay guys TELL ME when should the PO give his information out especially given how close this game day is to being the penultimate one. This is whats fucking pissing me off more than anything if you guys aren't mafia what the hell thought process is it that makes you think that way.

[Sifright]

Originally Posted by Fenris

Vote count!

Nikose 1
Sifright

Sifright 2
rpgdemon
Hawk

rpgdemon 2
Ryanderman
Bard

greed 3
Aldurin
Revolving Ocelot
Nikose

Karesh 18,000,000,080,000,062
Karesh x 18,000,000,080,000,062

IT IS NOW NIGH

just kiddin

People fix your vote formating whether you want to kill me or not.

[Karrrrrrrrrrrresche]

hmmmmmmm.

Vote: Greed

Still suspicious of RPG, but I'm coming to believe that's just because he's grasping after a straw. He wants Sif to be scum and that's clouding his judgement of what is or is not a safe bet.
Revolving Ocelot remains one of my "Townie as fuck" people so far so I think I'll defer to him until such time as I have a better idea.

[The Artist Formerly Known as Hawk]

Originally Posted by Sifright

Right Hawk's points are I'm suspicious of people voting to kill inactives, and bullshit about me calling on the PO to confirm me which i've never once asked for. Also hawks another low activity poster.

HOS:Hawk

No, I said I didn't understand what your were getting at by pointing the finger at people who voted for Fawful, including known townies. If townies themselves were voting for fawful, and arrived at that decision on their own, how does that make everyone else who voted for him inherently scummy by default?

As for my low post count, it's really irrelevant. My average daily post count on this site isn't massively high anyway, and never has been, because even though I'm around and reading the forum, I only post when I actually have something to say, which in most other threads is either a short jokey post or a post in direct response to a thread topic, and I often then don't go back and read much more of the thread after that point.

You'll also note that I rarely if ever post in more serious topics, because I'm not the best person at making long well thought out arguments, which is one of the reasons why I never signed up for mafia before now, because I knew I'd be pretty terrible at it anyway.

And on that point, I'm starting to regret I ever did, because after however many hundreds of posts in this game and however many arguments and counter arguments I still have no idea who might be scum. I also can't keep up with your own 14 posts an hour rate which is why I haven't been posting during this latest debate because by the time I get half way through it I lose track of what's even being said. I also only ever tend to post if I actually have something to say, which I didn't until now.

Now I imagine you'll probably make about 6 posts refuting and angrily dismissing everything I've just said now, before voting for me, and that's fine, because to be honest I'm starting to lose interest in the game at this point. It started out fun and there was a genuinse sense that maybe it's actually possible to work out who might be scum, but it seems to me I might as well just pick somebody at random here for all the sense I have of the general arguments. At the end of the day none of us actually know anything for sure. And besides, as you've pointed out, after the disasterous 2nd night we're probably going to lose anyway.

For now though;

Unvote: Sifright

Vote: Greed

He's my second choice of lynch today and it seems the vote is going that way, so we may as well get concensus on this.

[Sifright]

Originally Posted by Hawk

No, I said I didn't understand what your were getting at by pointing the finger at people who voted for Fawful, including known townies. If townies themselves were voting for fawful, and arrived at that decision on their own, how does that make everyone else who voted for him inherently scummy by default?

As for my low post count, it's really irrelevant. My average daily post count on this site isn't massively high anyway, and never has been, because even though I'm around and reading the forum, I only post when I actually have something to say, which in most other threads is either a short jokey post or a post in direct response to a thread topic, and I often then don't go back and read much more of the thread after that point.

You'll also note that I rarely if ever post in more serious topics, because I'm not the best person at making long well thought out arguments, which is one of the reasons why I never signed up for mafia before now, because I knew I'd be pretty terrible at it anyway.

And on that point, I'm starting to regret I ever did, because after however many hundreds of posts in this game and however many arguments and counter arguments I still have no idea who might be scum. I also can't keep up with your own 14 posts an hour rate which is why I haven't been posting during this latest debate because by the time I get half way through it I lose track of what's even being said. I also only ever tend to post if I actually have something to say, which I didn't until now.

Now I imagine you'll probably make about 6 posts refuting and angrily dismissing everything I've just said now, before voting for me, and that's fine, because to be honest I'm starting to lose interest in the game at this point. It started out fun and there was a genuinse sense that maybe it's actually possible to work out who might be scum, but it seems to me I might as well just pick somebody at random here for all the sense I have of the general arguments. At the end of the day none of us actually know anything for sure. And besides, as you've pointed out, after the disasterous 2nd night we're probably going to lose anyway.

For now though;

Unvote: Sifright

Vote: Greed

He's my second choice of lynch today and it seems the vote is going that way, so we may as well get concensus on this.

Actually that allays alot of suspicion I have about you. I mean you could still be mafia but You weren't high on my potential mafia hit list.

[Sifright]

Originally Posted by Hawk

Al, I told you not to do that again. Why would you do that again? So far town hasn't had the chance to make a decent lynch of its own and you keep wanting to override us. What ARE you playing at??!

Still, at least we know you're powerless now, though your irrational nature and apparant poor judgement lead me to believe I should no more trust anything you say than anyone else in this game, despite your confirmed town status.

On that note however, yes, I agree greed is shifty looking. Far too much inactivity for my liking, alongside Ryanderman. Greed also turned up just a few hours after somebody else started getting suspicious of him, and judging by the way inactives have been falling out of this game he might be getting worried he's next.

I'm also still suspicious of Sifright. Twice now he's called out the PO to confirm his town status and I've had an off feeling about him since that whole confirmation thing with Karesh. He could easily have been scum trying to lure out a clear townie in Fluttershy, with the hope that Fluttershy would be a power role to kill off. This of course was immediately negated by the fact that Karesh claims Fluttershy is bulletproof, which would make the mafia think twice about attempting a kill.

And from what I'm gathering from last night, it appears both the mafia and SK tried to kill Zecora, with one overiding the other, which would seem to indicate that Fenris IS giving us fluff info about failed kills. So the mafia wouldn't bother to test Kareshs claim if they suspected he's bulletproof, because it would only confirm that he's town for the rest of us in the fluff. Besides which there's plenty of other targets to go after and they could pretty much ignore the unkillables if they wanted.

Then there's Sifs finger pointing about Fawful, which, as indicated, involves a lot of players, including some confirmed town (even "his" confirmed town Karesh was mentioned as being wary of Fawful). But as we know, Fawful was taken down by the vig, so I don't know why this finger pointing is even going on, unless he's pointing fingers at people he thinks is the vig, which is pure scum. You do NOT point fingers at the vig, ever.

All this leads me to beleive that Sif is trying to lure out power roles so the mafia can kill them, and for that reason

Vote: Sifright

Scratch that just reread his post. I'm wary of people that went after Fawful because we found out that Fawful was town (unless you're presuming pinkie pie wasn't town) and two was completely inactive killing 100% inactive people is something i've been against since the START.

Bare in mind voting people shouldn't ever be about one single issue baring a PO going THIS DUDE HERE IS SCUM. We aren't looking for a single smoking gun because you won't find that it has to be about a multitude of issues which stack up over the course of a few game days.

Unfortunately with my handling of certain key issues that puts me in the firing line as well I mean there is legitimate reason to be wary of me.

So yes I went back and looked over people that I believe could be scum to see how they handled voting with regards to Fawful it's why I pointed out RPGDEMON as wanting to kill an inactive because he voted for him which is ostensibly the most important action a person can do. I know Karesh isn't scum but that doesn't mean he can't do things that seem scummy to me.

[Sifright]

You know what i'm going to slave my votes to karesh, I know he isn't scum. Thats good enough for me.

Unvote:Rpgdemon

Vote:Greed

[Fenris]

Sifright, could you like, do me a huge favor and only post one post per coherent thought?

You're sitting at like, 90 more posts than the second place poster but that's because you're posting like 8 posts per 1 bit of content.

[Sifright]

Originally Posted by Fenris

Sifright, could you like, do me a huge favor and only post one post per coherent thought?

You're sitting at like, 90 more posts than the second place poster but that's because you're posting like 8 posts per 1 bit of content.

I'll shut up now.