I thought this was funny at first now it just makes me angry

[DFM]

In my defense I like to reply to threads without reading them.

[Premmy]

Originally Posted by Invisible Queen

I don't think trolling is fun either. Girlsarebetterthanboys is funny precisely because it's inoffensive. It's doing the exact same thing without anyone taking offense, which makes it brutally clear how ridiculous the other site is that lives only on offense.

For generous values of "doing", anyway. How are things, Rejected?

You really underestimate the types of people who use the "word" "Feminazis"

[Mirai Gen]

Originally Posted by DFM

Lev you better be satire, I'll break your dick.

Dooooooooooo iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiittttt.

I don't think he's lolsatireing.

[Hanuman]

Of course it's a satire, but its also got a pretty correct basis, the reason why anyone would get mad at my post is the same reason they'd get mad at that guy, a weak sense of humor/basis of past experience playing on emotions/hormones/possibly a righteous or proprietary disposition.

Spock would eyebrow quizzical, data would stare blankly and agree though bring up how it would be a hyperbole to assume this is true of everyone, Q would lol.

[Kim]

Originally Posted by Lev

a weak sense of humor/basis of past experience playing on emotions/hormones/possibly a righteous or proprietary disposition.

Or maybe the people who think being offensive for the sake of being offensive is funny are the ones with the problem. That's how I see it anyways.

[Archbio]

Of course it's a satire, but its also got a pretty correct basis

Having cake, meet eating cake.

[DFM]

Trolling is just playing devil's advocate for reprehensible positions. Good trolls are obviously more subtle about it, you can't just jump in and defend the holocaust.

[Hanuman]

Originally Posted by DFM

Trolling is just playing devil's advocate for reprehensible positions. Good trolls are obviously more subtle about it, you can't just jump in and defend the holocaust.

I would say that's debatable, I would say a good troll is one who gets the most rise out of their target, and the least rise or possibly enjoyment out of the audience. (A good example would be S. Colbert vs socially retarded leftists.)

I would say the most impact-heavy or effective troll is one who trolls in a way that no one even thinks of classifying it as trolling and gets maximum rise from the audience, but at that point it stops being childish as much as malicious which I do not support at all.

On the other side of that spectrum you have trolls who believe they are helping someone, like the metaphorical imaging of FF Tactics, which I do entirely support if done with good intent, even if the effect is somewhat less that desired.

[Premmy]

Originally Posted by Lev

I would say that's debatable, I would say a good troll is one who gets the most rise out of their target, and the least rise or possibly enjoyment out of the audience. (A good example would be S. Colbert vs socially retarded leftists.)

I would say the most impact-heavy or effective troll is one who trolls in a way that no one even thinks of classifying it as trolling and gets maximum rise from the audience, but at that point it stops being childish as much as malicious which I do not support at all.

You're applying the concept of "Troll" to the concept of "Satirist"
A "Troll" is a blunt-force, piss-people off specialist
a Satirist makes a statement about something via multiple methods, usually by ballooining the aspects of X they find mos deplorable.
Trolling is'nt complex it's
"Haha, they're pissed off"

[Archbio]

Trolling is just basically a lack of empathy. This thing about the virtue of laughing along with trolling and congratulation trolls is just double-trolling.