|
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Preposterous! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Not a Taco
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,313
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Well, here's how it played out: I was like, "Man, I dunno what to do. I'm a good guy character! He wouldn't want to kill anyone! I should just play my character!"
Then it was explained to me, no, that's not how you do it.
__________________
I did a lot of posting on here as a teenager, and I was pretty awful. Even after I learned, grew up, and came to be on the right side of a lot of important issues, I was still angry, abrasive, and generally increased the amount of hate in the world, in pretty unacceptable ways. On the off chance that someone is taking a trip down memory lane looking through those old threads, I wanted to devote my signature to say directly to you, I'm sorry. Thank you for letting me be better, NPF. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Oh, right. Well.
Fenris, could we get a rule list of some sort? Like, to help the newbies along? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Well, I wasn't in the homestuck game, and neither was Sif (I think?) so it's kinda hard to learn from mistakes we didn't actually make, y'know?
Also, I don't know what made you leave NPF in the first place. But please believe me when I say that there were no personal attacks there. We were both just commenting on your behavior within the game, we both think you're cool. Sif even said so. Though I still wanna know how Smarty knows how big your dick is. Did you have hypothetical celestial string-theory sex with him? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Fact sphere is the most handsome
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,108
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I was in the Homestuck mafia game. I made a bit of a hash out of it, I was the town doctor only managed to save one dude.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Administrator
|
![]()
okay so
chat thing nobody's getting punished, just don't do it again and rules http://www.nuklearforums.com/showthread.php?t=12706 I'm partial to those, but I did kind of write a big first post with rules in it too.
__________________
"FENRIS IS AN ASSHOLE" - shiney
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
SOM3WH3R3
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,606
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I get your point. Fenris didn't kill us, we must have been allowed to talk outside of chat.
But there's other reasons for Fenris to not kill us, the most obvious being that, hey, we didn't hurt anyone, and we immediately confessed, so Fen is being lenient. I mean, I don't think he wants to kill an extra 3 players in the first night. And while I'm a noob, I really can't see your argument that "Whoever talks, dies, DEFINITELY" as watertight, because it's not like the first time this has happened. The same thing happened in the homestuck mafia game, and nobody died that. I think you're just expecting GMs to be a lot stricter than they actually are, and you're using that expectation to justify our lynching. Add to that the fact that it would make absolutely no sense for a group of scum to reveal that they'd been talking in chat, and your argument is really not looking very watertight. Edit: RPG summed up my second paragraph very nicely. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Administrator
|
![]()
oh
and edit thing fix typos and shit, but keep in mind that I am totally capable of seeing edit histories and will modkill for cheating.
__________________
"FENRIS IS AN ASSHOLE" - shiney
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Never give up. Never give in.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,034
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
So, back on the topic of who to lynch. What ever happened to killing off the inactives? I mean, we agreed pretty early on that inactives are detrimental to the Town regardless of whether they're scum or not. So why are we wasting time trying to figure out who MIGHT be scum when we can get almost all positives from booting an inactive out?
__________________
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - Robert Heinlein |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Curious
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 208
![]() |
![]()
I think the opposition to rooting out inactives is (unless I just misread everything) that we'd be lynching people who are probably town when discussing things could lead to some progress in finding scum because then we have more information. Snake wants to take Day 1 more seriously and we would be off to a stronger start Day 2.
Anyway, we've got until Thursday. Another day to talk it out before deciding on a vote later Wednesday/early Thursday.
__________________
Sneaking around the forums to read your posts. Last edited by Oron; 09-26-2011 at 11:58 PM. Reason: Keep submitting before I finish my thought. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|