|
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
History's Strongest Dilettante
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
"There are worlds out there where the sky is burning, and the sea is asleep, and the rivers dream. People made of smoke and cities made of song. Somewhere there's danger, somewhere there's injustice, somewhere else the tea's getting cold. Come on, Ace; we've got work to do!" Awesome art be here. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||
Data is Turned On
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
A definition that is that broad needs to make those exceptions. So you're defining racism as all of the 'othering' behaviors, thoughts, institutions that occurs not fully within a single identifiable race, regardless if a proper concept of 'race' is a factor or not. I don't think it's a very useful definition, but I'm not sure if my meaning is clear.
__________________
6201 Reasons to Support Electoral Reform. Last edited by Archbio; 01-09-2009 at 12:21 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
The End of Evolution
|
![]()
Well there's two ways to argue this.
One is that racism is an extension of tribalism. Tribalism is the habit of people to form groupings in order to survive, mate, and live. Usually it is made up of a group of familiars, or people that they try to pretend are familiars. The unfortunate side effect of making an "in" group is that it makes an "out" group. When the "in/out" distinction is race, it's racism. Although really, tribalism extends all the way from nationality to your book club. It just so happens that race is dependent on physical characteristics, making it much easier to make distinctions between "tribes". Basically, by that understanding, racism has existed since forever. And then there's the creation of racism as a negative attribute. Racism as a word, with the connotation of reflecting poorly on one's character as apposed to being natural and obvious. Arguing on when that concept originated would be interesting. EDIT: Quote:
__________________
And this world's smartest man means no more to me than does its smartest termite. ~Dr. Manhattan
Last edited by The Wizard Who Did It; 01-09-2009 at 12:19 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Unlicensed Practitioner
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 801
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
It's easiest to think of in terms of ethnicity, which in the roughest sense is anything by which people base cultural identities (region, history, appearance, belief systems, etc). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Whatever
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Around. Here, there...
Posts: 838
![]() |
![]()
Who's racist against Asians anyway?
What do/did they do?
__________________
Behold the Nightmare |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
pretty cool guy
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 814
![]() ![]() |
![]()
During WWII, the Japanese invaded mainland China, and killed, imprisoned, or displaced thousands (millions?) of Chinese. They haven't forgotten, and that animosity is still simmering today.
During WWII, Japan preemptively bombed Pearl Harbor, in an attempt to cripple the US Navy forces in the Pacific. Although Japan and the US forged close ties during the Cold War, and is today one of America's largest trading partners, there are still people who remember Japan unfavorably. China is the largest country by population in the world, and with their recent economic growth, they are slowly emerging onto the world stage. Many in the Western world view them as a threat and destabilizing force. However, prejudice doesn't really need a justification; the only requirements is a defining factor of groups and an "us vs. them" mentality. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Waylaid by Jackassery.
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 382
![]() |
![]()
I think it was Sam Rayburn who said:
"If we woke up tomorrow and everyone was the same race, creed and religion, by lunch we would figure out something new to hate in each other."
__________________
:rmage: "Clearly I lack arrogance as that would be a flaw" |
![]() |
|
|