"Global Warming" or "Interesting Debate On Munk" - Page 6

Bob The Mercenary · 03-06-2010, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sifright

Whoa.. such blatant trolling. (to clarify ibian is the one i think is trolling... not that it should need it.)

As much as everyone's been accusing him of trolling. It's really really really not trolling. As lots and lots of people share his opinions...most of them.

bluestarultor · 03-06-2010, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob the Mercenary

As much as everyone's been accusing him of trolling. It's really really really not trolling. As lots and lots of people share his opinions...most of them.

I REALLY highly doubt that most people think we're saving ourselves from an ice age.

Bob The Mercenary · 03-06-2010, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluestarultor

I REALLY highly doubt that most people think we're saving ourselves from an ice age.

I thought the "most of them" referred to that part. But honestly, many many people think there are too many people wanting to push political agendas that they actually influenced the scientific community to go along with them.

It's not that difficult to see where he's coming from without referring to it as "trolling".

Amake · 03-06-2010, 06:13 PM

Replace "Global warming" with "Jews" and this thread might sound like it's 1935 all over again. Everything bad that happens can be traced back to global warming, and we're going to have to kill six billion people so that the rest can live! Okay, so six billion instead of six million, that's a lot of interest. But that's global warming's fault. Global warming owns all the banks and all the big business, have you noticed that?

Sifright · 03-06-2010, 06:27 PM

Either s/he is trolling or else is employing a five year olds understanding of science... the basic premise really isn't complicated.

Mirai Gen · 03-06-2010, 06:38 PM

FOREIGN WHORES!!!

Ryanderman · 03-06-2010, 06:41 PM

I don't agree with Ibian's posts, and I'm not trying to argue on his side, but (there had to be a but) what if the greenhouse emissions from humanity are covering up what would otherwise be a natural ice age? If that were the case, then theoretically, if we were to eliminate our emissions, it could allow the Earth to settle back into it's natural cycle, producing the ice age Ibian describes? Would there be a way to know if we should, our impact aside, be in one right now?

Mirai Gen · 03-06-2010, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryanderman

I don't agree with Ibian's posts, and I'm not trying to argue on his side, but (there had to be a but) what if the greenhouse emissions from humanity are covering up what would otherwise be a natural ice age? If that were the case, then theoretically, if we were to eliminate our emissions, it could allow the Earth to settle back into it's natural cycle, producing the ice age Ibian describes? Would there be a way to know if we should, our impact aside, be in one right now?

Greenland 1992 vs 2002

If we actually were in an 'ice age' and we're counteracting it, then we've drastically overshot. The target wasn't even in the same country as us, is what I'm saying.

EDIT: I don't even want to bother with him anymore.

If Ibian isn't Godhand, or at least a Godhand Jr., then I have a hat I'm going to eat.

Ryanderman · 03-06-2010, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mirai Gen

Compelling Pcitures

I wasn't trying to support his argument. I had just been looking at his claim of freezing the earth, and tried to think of any way that could make sense. My previous post was the only one I could come up with.

Mirai Gen · 03-06-2010, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ryanderman

I wasn't trying to support his argument. I had just been looking at his claim of freezing the earth, and tried to think of any way that could make sense. My previous post was the only one I could come up with.

Yeah I wasn't directing it at you, at least not cruelly. The post was purely to provide the evidence you were asking for, and I was trying to keep it civilly relaxed around you.

No worries - we're cool.

03-06-2010, 06:13 PM	#4
Amake Keeper of the new Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: A place without judgment Posts: 4,506	Obviously we have to be able to joke about global warming to deal with it Replace "Global warming" with "Jews" and this thread might sound like it's 1935 all over again. Everything bad that happens can be traced back to global warming, and we're going to have to kill six billion people so that the rest can live! Okay, so six billion instead of six million, that's a lot of interest. But that's global warming's fault. Global warming owns all the banks and all the big business, have you noticed that? __________________ Hope insistent, trust implicit, love inherent, life immersed

03-06-2010, 06:38 PM	#6
Mirai Gen We are Geth. Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 14,032	FOREIGN WHORES!!! __________________ Last edited by Mirai Gen; 03-06-2010 at 06:41 PM.

03-06-2010, 06:41 PM	#7
Ryanderman Beard of Leadership Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 827	I don't agree with Ibian's posts, and I'm not trying to argue on his side, but (there had to be a but) what if the greenhouse emissions from humanity are covering up what would otherwise be a natural ice age? If that were the case, then theoretically, if we were to eliminate our emissions, it could allow the Earth to settle back into it's natural cycle, producing the ice age Ibian describes? Would there be a way to know if we should, our impact aside, be in one right now? __________________ ~Your robot reminds me of you. You tell it to stop, it turns. You tell it to turn, it stops. You tell it to take out the trash, it watches reruns of Firefly.~

03-06-2010, 06:27 PM	#5
Sifright Fact sphere is the most handsome Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,108	Either s/he is trolling or else is employing a five year olds understanding of science... the basic premise really isn't complicated.