What Kind of D&D Character Would You Be?

[ThatPoorMessenger]

It's only logical.

Indeed, it is, but they seem to not plan ahead.

[Eldezar]

I started playing with it and it was funny how it went from lawful evil human monk (10) to chaotic evil human fighter/ranger (5/5) by changing the answer to one question.

[ThatPoorMessenger]

Originally Posted by Eldezar

I started playing with it and it was funny how it went from lawful evil human monk (10) to chaotic evil human fighter/ranger (5/5) by changing the answer to one question.

Monk's are attached to lawfulness, along with Paladins in that survey I believe. Being otuside the neccessary alignment is stated to reduce your score for said class by 21, I think.

[krogothwolf]

Originally Posted by Eldezar

I started playing with it and it was funny how it went from lawful evil human monk (10) to chaotic evil human fighter/ranger (5/5) by changing the answer to one question.

That means you're over 88 years old to be level 10! YOU ONE CRAZY MONK!

[ThatPoorMessenger]

Originally Posted by krogothwolf

That means you're over 88 years old to be level 10! YOU ONE CRAZY MONK!

He's lying for extra levels!

[Eldezar]

Originally Posted by ThatPoorMessenger

Monk's are attached to lawfulness, along with Paladins in that survey I believe. Being otuside the neccessary alignment is stated to reduce your score for said class by 21, I think.

It wasn't a law question.

126. What's the best path to wealth?

• It's a matter of luck and being in the right place at the right time.
• Staying flexible so you can take advantage of good opportunities.
• Following a long-term plan that incorporates a comfortable level of risk.
• Hard work and perseverance.

The class change is understandable, and it would have to require an alignment change to be a Monk, but the question itself has little to nothing to do with alignment. (bullet 4 made a monk, bullet 2 made fighter/ranger)

EDIT:

Originally Posted by krogothwolf

That means you're over 88 years old to be level 10! YOU ONE CRAZY MONK!

Like I said, I was playing with it. My actual stats are on the previous page.

EDIT 2: If you view 40 posts per page.

[ThatPoorMessenger]

The class change is understandable, and it would have to require an alignment change to be a Monk, but the question itself has little to nothing to do with alignment. (bullet 4 made a monk, bullet 2 made fighter/ranger)

Bullet 2 is closer to chaos, as it revolves around being capable of change and a lack of focus, by contrast, bullet 4 is about staying focussed and following a set path. Law and Chaos would be better coined as Order and Chaos, but that doesn't even coin the whole lot of it.
Law as an alignment is more about focus, determination and loyalty however, whilst Chaos is about being flexible, adaptable, and generally diving into things.

[Eldezar]

Originally Posted by ThatPoorMessenger

Bullet 2 is closer to chaos, as it revolves around being capable of change and a lack of focus, by contrast, bullet 4 is about staying focussed and following a set path. Law and Chaos would be better coined as Order and Chaos, but that doesn't even coin the whole lot of it.
Law as an alignment is more about focus, determination and loyalty however, whilst Chaos is about being flexible, adaptable, and generally diving into things.

Which is why I said little to nothing.

[krogothwolf]

Originally Posted by Eldezar

Like I said, I was playing with it. My actual stats are on the previous page.

EDIT 2: If you view 40 posts per page.

I know what you're actually stats are, it's just hilarious thinking of an 88+ year old lawful evil monk kicking ass. Seriously, That'd be freaking awesome

[ThatPoorMessenger]

Originally Posted by Eldezar

Which is why I said little to nothing.

True, no denying that. I just felt like rambling about the system out of compulsion to post.