Black Mage's contract - Page 2

Outbounder · 03-12-2004, 07:54 PM

Yes, no matter what Thief will find away. Because he is Thief.

Snefix · 03-12-2004, 09:06 PM

Speaking as someone that has taken several Business Law courses at my University I'd like to think I'm somewhat qualified to answer this question.

It would entirely depend on the language of the contract, of course, but under most circumstances if one party of the contract dies that particular portion of the contract immediatly becomes void. It would really depend on if each character is considered to be a differnent party in the terms of the contract(Thief, RM, BM, Fighter) or if there are two parties(Thief, and then the rest work for him).
If there are only two parties, BM's death would significantly change the terms of the contract to the extent that it'd have to be restructered or voided. If each party is seperate, it's likely the contract would remain intact, but the portion regarding BM's obligations would be nulled. When he revives, BM would no longer be obligated to Thief to do whatever the contract reads. Unless in the contract it specifically mentions what should occur if a person in the contract is considered to be legally dead and then returns to life. Which I'm guessing Thief is smart enough to do.

03-12-2004, 10:02 PM

I think there are five parties-Fighter, Thief, BM, RM, and the party as a whole, because Thief refers to himself as the party of the fifth part

Smashlink · 03-12-2004, 10:36 PM

Knowing Thief, master of obfuscation and lies, he included in the contract a clause stating that the contract retains all...stuff... even in case of death, upon which time Thief gains control of their souls.

03-13-2004, 04:21 AM

either that or theif, just had super super super super x infinty FINE PRINT

03-13-2004, 08:29 PM

yeah, he's probably written in fine print on the bottom:

In-case of death and ressurection or rebirth, the contract remains valid.

Klyco · 03-13-2004, 08:31 PM

Maybe BM will destroy it with a Fire Spell

Aerozord · 03-13-2004, 09:56 PM

Now that i think about it since this is Final Fantasy Thief would have remembered the death clause and that people can be revived. Thus he would prevent such a loop-hole from forming

behemoth · 03-15-2004, 02:05 PM

I think this is a question brian would have to answer, cuz only he knows the teenie weenie details of the contract.

03-15-2004, 03:56 PM

Or just maybe he makes bits up as and when they are convenient

.

03-12-2004, 07:54 PM	#11
Outbounder Legendary Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Missouri Posts: 785	Yes, no matter what Thief will find away. Because he is Thief. __________________ "The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, inhibit clarity, and obscure poor reasoning." - Calvin and Hobbes "Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once he grows up. " - Pablo Picasso

03-12-2004, 10:36 PM	#14
Smashlink Hume Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Where ever I go, there I am. Posts: 107	Knowing Thief, master of obfuscation and lies, he included in the contract a clause stating that the contract retains all...stuff... even in case of death, upon which time Thief gains control of their souls. __________________ Bah!

03-13-2004, 08:31 PM	#17
Klyco Look'nForAGood WhiteMage Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: West Covina, California Posts: 1,625	Maybe BM will destroy it with a Fire Spell __________________ :bmage:When I was the Hell King, We'd feast on the souls of the gluttons. It was like eating murder marinated in sin. It was bliss. Guard:Look at those Cure albums! No emotionally balanced, healthy person wold listen to THAT! :bmage: check out my page at klyco.1up.com

03-13-2004, 09:56 PM	#18
Aerozord So we are clear Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Former murder capital of the world Posts: 13,824	Now that i think about it since this is Final Fantasy Thief would have remembered the death clause and that people can be revived. Thus he would prevent such a loop-hole from forming __________________ "don't hate me for being a heterosexual white guy disparaging slacktivism, hate me for all those murders I've done."

03-15-2004, 02:05 PM	#19
behemoth Master of Puppets! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Wherever the pie takes me Posts: 312	I think this is a question brian would have to answer, cuz only he knows the teenie weenie details of the contract. __________________ Pie! :bmage: :bmage: :bmage: :bmage: Pie! must have woman made of pie drool "I am God, and you are my GERBIL! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!" -Me "That is because it is too complexible of a topic for your simplistible minds!" -Me "Oh my God! It's GINORMOUS!" -Rather not say Nick is a geek nod nod AAACK! FLYING BIRD! Visit my site and insult me! Me site I will soon rule the universe. All I need now is really cool theme music. ...Pie

03-12-2004, 09:06 PM	#12
Snefix Troopa Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 56	Speaking as someone that has taken several Business Law courses at my University I'd like to think I'm somewhat qualified to answer this question. It would entirely depend on the language of the contract, of course, but under most circumstances if one party of the contract dies that particular portion of the contract immediatly becomes void. It would really depend on if each character is considered to be a differnent party in the terms of the contract(Thief, RM, BM, Fighter) or if there are two parties(Thief, and then the rest work for him). If there are only two parties, BM's death would significantly change the terms of the contract to the extent that it'd have to be restructered or voided. If each party is seperate, it's likely the contract would remain intact, but the portion regarding BM's obligations would be nulled. When he revives, BM would no longer be obligated to Thief to do whatever the contract reads. Unless in the contract it specifically mentions what should occur if a person in the contract is considered to be legally dead and then returns to life. Which I'm guessing Thief is smart enough to do.

03-12-2004, 10:02 PM	#13
38special Guest Posts: n/a	I think there are five parties-Fighter, Thief, BM, RM, and the party as a whole, because Thief refers to himself as the party of the fifth part

03-13-2004, 04:21 AM	#15
SurgeDragonZeroX Guest Posts: n/a	either that or theif, just had super super super super x infinty FINE PRINT

03-13-2004, 08:29 PM	#16
Yank Guest Posts: n/a	yeah, he's probably written in fine print on the bottom: In-case of death and ressurection or rebirth, the contract remains valid.

03-15-2004, 03:56 PM	#20
Dr DR Guest Posts: n/a	Or just maybe he makes bits up as and when they are convenient .