Thread: In this thread, science gets disproven
View Single Post
Unread 05-06-2010, 12:19 PM   #6
Professor Smarmiarty
Sent to the cornfield
 
Professor Smarmiarty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: K-space
Posts: 9,758
Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law. Professor Smarmiarty isn't just above the law -- they are the law.
Send a message via MSN to Professor Smarmiarty
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by NonCon View Post
There is a great difference between explaining the limitations of logic and using incredibly faulty logic to come to incorrect conclusions as "proof" that logic is flawed.
Godel disagrees with pages and pages of maths.


Quote:
But can you see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?
I'm not sure what the question is here. Do I need to disprove that kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch? Because this thread is about destroying science not proving it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01d55 View Post
Man you lyin'. You a lyin' commie.
9) See 7 where I dismiss Marx as a hack

Quote:
Originally Posted by BloodyMage View Post
It's written not spoken therefore it's libel, not slander, no?
10) I spoke it aloud as I read it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fifthfiend View Post
Complete thread collapse in three sentences, impressively executed.
11) Thread still going, postulate disproven.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Invisible Queen View Post
Still talking about the bridges between the mind and other realms, not the mind itself.

Although I will give The Origin of Consciousness another try. I've been looking for an excuse to read it.
Bridges that have been shown to rely heavily on physical world. No matter how you spin it, your imaginary functions relies upon physical processes.

12) Human intelligence lead to tool making, dominance over other animals
Latest poll result shows Tories leading by wide margin. Thus humans are stupid, thus this is fault.

13) Neurotransmitters only work in certain kinds of neuroreceptors based on lock and key type mechanisms- Patentely false, molecular mechanic hard sphere type models consistently fail in modelling organic processes due to theri soft electron systems which are easily perturbed, particularly the pi bonding networks of neurotransmitter type molecules.

14) Origin of life started in water- Water promotes hydrolysis of early peptide bonds rather than their formation, solutions would be too diluted to feasibly react, common energy sources for the reactions are hindered by the presence of water.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archbio View Post
The mind itself still isn't disprovable, re: Descartes via Nietzsche (something thinks, therefore something is.) Of course, that's not science, but so isn't this thread!
Hegel, Marx, Heidegger, Lacan- all would take you up on that.
Also of course this thread isn't Science- it's showing Science is wrong!
Last edited by Professor Smarmiarty; 05-06-2010 at 12:22 PM.
Professor Smarmiarty is offline Add to Professor Smarmiarty's Reputation   Reply With Quote