In this thread, science gets disproven

[Kim]

Originally Posted by Smarty McBarrelpants

Logic is inherentely limited- see ref point 3 and the incompleteness theorum. Also see analysis of neural structure and linguistic and musical forms- logic is possibly a product of our brain interpretation of the universe not the other way around.

There is a great difference between explaining the limitations of logic and using incredibly faulty logic to come to incorrect conclusions as "proof" that logic is flawed.

Also this is not a scientific problem for me to challenge.

But can you see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

[01d55]

In this thread, science gets disproven

Originally Posted by Smarty McBarrelpants

I was using logic to show that the scientific method is internally limited, not that it was wrong, just that it can only represent certain things.
Learn to readzzzzz.

Man you lyin'. You a lyin' commie.

[BloodyMage]

Originally Posted by Smarty McBarrelpants

A
Again, lies and slander. I am foremost a gentleman, secondly a scholar.

It's written not spoken therefore it's libel, not slander, no?

[Fifthfiend]

Originally Posted by Smarty McBarrelpants

Part 2: Colour
Red and yellow mixed make green.

Complete thread collapse in three sentences, impressively executed.

[Amake]

Still talking about the bridges between the mind and other realms, not the mind itself.

Although I will give The Origin of Consciousness another try. I've been looking for an excuse to read it.

[Archbio]

Still talking about the bridges between the mind and other realms, not the mind itself.

The mind itself still isn't disprovable, re: Descartes via Nietzsche (something thinks, therefore something is.) Of course, that's not science, but so isn't this thread!

[Professor Smarmiarty]

Originally Posted by NonCon

There is a great difference between explaining the limitations of logic and using incredibly faulty logic to come to incorrect conclusions as "proof" that logic is flawed.

Godel disagrees with pages and pages of maths.

But can you see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

I'm not sure what the question is here. Do I need to disprove that kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch? Because this thread is about destroying science not proving it.

Originally Posted by 01d55

Man you lyin'. You a lyin' commie.

9) See 7 where I dismiss Marx as a hack

Originally Posted by BloodyMage

It's written not spoken therefore it's libel, not slander, no?

10) I spoke it aloud as I read it.

Originally Posted by Fifthfiend

Complete thread collapse in three sentences, impressively executed.

11) Thread still going, postulate disproven.

Originally Posted by Invisible Queen

Still talking about the bridges between the mind and other realms, not the mind itself.

Although I will give The Origin of Consciousness another try. I've been looking for an excuse to read it.

Bridges that have been shown to rely heavily on physical world. No matter how you spin it, your imaginary functions relies upon physical processes.

12) Human intelligence lead to tool making, dominance over other animals
Latest poll result shows Tories leading by wide margin. Thus humans are stupid, thus this is fault.

13) Neurotransmitters only work in certain kinds of neuroreceptors based on lock and key type mechanisms- Patentely false, molecular mechanic hard sphere type models consistently fail in modelling organic processes due to theri soft electron systems which are easily perturbed, particularly the pi bonding networks of neurotransmitter type molecules.

14) Origin of life started in water- Water promotes hydrolysis of early peptide bonds rather than their formation, solutions would be too diluted to feasibly react, common energy sources for the reactions are hindered by the presence of water.

Originally Posted by Archbio

The mind itself still isn't disprovable, re: Descartes via Nietzsche (something thinks, therefore something is.) Of course, that's not science, but so isn't this thread!

Hegel, Marx, Heidegger, Lacan- all would take you up on that.
Also of course this thread isn't Science- it's showing Science is wrong!

[Amake]

It's only physical tools that have shown the physical world to be the origin of all existence. I think it was Buddha who said, "We are spiritual beings having a human experience".

But anyway, like I said, even if imagination is a product of a physical world which is a figment of imagination, that's no reason to assume imagination also is a figment of imagination.

[Rejected Again]

Ok SMB, what about the theory of the average IQ in the world dropping due to the accelerated breeding of humans with inferior minds, our heightened medicines, and no natural predators, combined with the fact that lower IQ families have, on average, twice as many children as higher intelligence families do. Can you disprove that, while the human race is growing, we are getting less intelligent as a whole?

[Fifthfiend]

Originally Posted by Smarty McBarrelpants

11) Thread still going