Above Political Correctness

[Kerensky287]

Originally Posted by Solid Snake

Such evidence would be allowed to determine punishment once a jury sentenced someone as guilty for the present crime, yes. Theoretically speaking if a Moderator said "under the rules NonCon is guilty -- and determining his guilt was based on evidence of his present actions alone and not his past acts" -- then after determining that NonCon was guilty, the evidence would be introduced and NonCon would get a stricter penalty.

Problem was the wording of Shiney's previous posts suggested that he relied upon NonCon's past reputation in determining his propensity to act the same way this time around in order to prove he was overreacting and therefore breaking the rules. If Shiney had said "I analyzed the evidence of NonCon and TDK's respective actions impartially, concluded objectively that NonCon was the one predominantly responsible, and then took past evidence into account solely to determine what punishment to assign him," yeah, that's within the bounds of the American legal system.

Originally Posted by Fenris

You've been down this road too many times for me to give you just another warning. I'll see you in ten days.

It wasn't Shiney but it was still a moderator.