All right, this has gone far enough (The Grammar Nazi Topic)

[A Zarkin' Frood]

You forgot to add the apostrophe and in fact all punctuation. If you you write captions for images on the internet you better make sure It's all correct. If your font doesn't provide any punctuation marks you can use MS Paint to add them. In fuchsia.

The word "what" is a demand for clarification in this case. You objected to that somehow. Yet, provided help in understanding what Karesh apparently had trouble understanding.

I feel I should check my grammar nazi posts for spelling errors but I just don't giev a fuck.

[Sifright]

I objected because it was obvious. That doesn't mean I won't provide clarification, also punctuation is clearly unneeded in image captions.

[Cloud Strife]

Originally Posted by Professor Smarmiarty

Man it would be real nice if people actually learnt what things are necessary to cite and what things aren't. Like citation isn't actually needed
But dictionary.com
definition 49 of good-
informal well.

Really, it was more along the lines of personally wanting to see it in writing. Plus I just verified it myself checking on dictionary.com's app. Yes, there is an app for that.

[Karrrrrrrrrrrresche]

Originally Posted by Sifright

I objected because it was obvious. That doesn't mean I won't provide clarification, also punctuation is clearly unneeded in image captions.

Did we swap languages and nobody sent me a memo about it? Cause Smarty's post makes absolutely no sense to me.

[Sifright]

Originally Posted by K-Resh

Did we swap languages and nobody sent me a memo about it? Cause Smarty's post makes absolutely no sense to me.

I weep for the lost skill of deductive reasoning.

[Karrrrrrrrrrrresche]

My comprehension is fine. Smarty's ability to be clear and your ability to explain what you mean is the problem here.

[Sifright]

Originally Posted by Cloud Strife

The one that bothers me the most is likely one of the more archaic rules of the English language. It's 'I am well', not 'I am good', dammit!

Originally Posted by Professor Smarmiarty

Man it would be real nice if people actually learnt what things are necessary to cite and what things aren't. Like citation isn't actually needed
But dictionary.com
definition 49 of good-
informal well.

Originally Posted by K-Resh

What.

Originally Posted by Sifright

Verdict: NOT GUILTY OF GRAMMATICAL ERROR.

...... also the lose of memory.

[A Zarkin' Frood]

Smarty's post was pretty clear yeah. Sure, he's not exactly formatting his posts in a way that makes them easier to read, (that's a flaw that comes with some degrees, as far as I'm aware) but I understoood everything he said in that post.

[Azisien]

u guise r hilarity

[Karrrrrrrrrrrresche]

Sir you're obviously being academically dishonest. Smart y's post is by no measure a legible and well formulated example of English.

You're trying to say that because you can contextually figure out what he means that his post is totally okay and that's no good.